Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice

This paper presents an examination of the significance of residential sorting or self selection effects in understanding the impacts of the built environment on travel choices. Land use and transportation system attributes are often treated as exogenous variables in models of travel behavior. Such models ignore the potential self selection processes that may be at play wherein households and individuals choose to locate in areas or built environments that are consistent with their lifestyle and transportation preferences, attitudes, and values. In this paper, a simultaneous model of residential location choice and commute mode choice that accounts for both observed and unobserved taste variations that may contribute to residential self selection is estimated on a survey sample extracted from the 2000 San Francisco Bay Area household travel survey. Model results show that both observed and unobserved residential self selection effects do exist; however, even after accounting for these effects, it is found that built environment attributes can indeed significantly impact commute mode choice behavior. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the model findings for policy planning.

[1]  Ming Zhang The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong , 2004 .

[2]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[3]  C. Bhat,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects , 2003 .

[4]  C. Bhat Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[5]  Stephen Gordon,et al.  EFFECT OF NEOTRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ON TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS , 1994 .

[6]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Travel Choice with No Alternative , 2006 .

[7]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Effect of Free Parking on Commuter Mode Choice: Evidence from Travel Diary Data , 2001 .

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[9]  Xin Ye,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns , 2007 .

[10]  A. Khattak,et al.  Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA , 2005 .

[11]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[12]  Reid Ewing,et al.  GETTING AROUND A TRADITIONAL CITY, A SUBURBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD), AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN , 1994 .

[13]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[14]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighborhood Type , 2004 .

[16]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? , 2005 .

[17]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels , 2007 .

[18]  Randall Crane,et al.  The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review , 2000 .

[19]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[20]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[21]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[22]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Examining The Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: Methodologies and Empirical Findings , 2008 .

[23]  R. Crane,et al.  DOES NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN INFLUENCE TRAVEL?: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL DIARY AND GIS DATA , 1998 .

[24]  H. Lund Testing the Claims of New Urbanism: Local Access, Pedestrian Travel, and Neighboring Behaviors , 2003 .

[25]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[26]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[27]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .

[28]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .