Social Media in Election Campaigns: The Case of the 2013 Presidential Elections in Cyprus

Social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) are today a regular form of communication used widely by individuals and organizations. More recently, social media are also used by political parties to communicate with voters. As a result, political parties engage in a new kind of conversation with voters, transforming campaigning into something more dynamic compared to what it was in the past. This engagement however varies by society. In some cases political parties simply send messages to voters while in others communication is more active. The current study provides evidence on the extent to which political parties and candidates adopted and used social media tools as part of their campaign in the 2013 presidential elections in Cyprus. Interviews with social media officers of five political parties were conducted with the aim of uncovering the frequency and type of social medial usage in the elections. Results reveal that social media were primarily used for one-way communication rather than being a means of discussion and interaction between politicians and voters. Most candidates used social media merely for dissemination of news, images, political messages, and upcoming events. However, all parties recognized that the role of social media in presidential elections could be enhanced to allow more interaction between candidates and voters.

[1]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Facebook and Greek Elections: New Fad or Real Transformation? , 2012, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[2]  Barry Friedman,et al.  Commentary: The impact of social networking tools on political change in Egypt's "Revolution 2.0" , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[3]  Ang Peng Hwa,et al.  Websites for E-Electioneering in Maharashtra and Gujarat, India , 2011, Internet Res..

[4]  Kristian Nicole Smith,et al.  Social Media and Political Campaigns , 2011 .

[5]  Larry Weber,et al.  Marketing to the Social Web: How Digital Customer Communities Build Your Business , 2007 .

[6]  Marius Johannessen Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2009 Norwegian Parliamentary Election , 2010, ePart.

[7]  Helmut Leopold,et al.  Social Media , 2012, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[8]  Salla-Maaria Laaksonen,et al.  The use of social media in the Finnish Parliament Elections 2011 , 2012 .

[9]  Adrian Palmer,et al.  An experiential, social network‐based approach to direct marketing , 2009 .

[10]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[11]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[12]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, election campaigning, and the internet , 2008 .

[14]  Noa Aharony,et al.  Twitter Use by three Political Leaders: An Exploratory Analysis , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[15]  Jessica T. Feezell,et al.  Facebook is... Fostering Political Engagement: A Study of Online Social Networking Groups and Offline Participation , 2009 .

[16]  Robert Wollan,et al.  The Social Media Management Handbook: Everything You Need To Know To Get Social Media Working In Your Business , 2010 .

[17]  Linus Osuagwu,et al.  Political marketing: conceptualisation, dimensions and research agenda , 2008 .