Understanding and managing water transitions: a policy science perspective

[1]  Barrie Needham,et al.  Institutional Economics and Policies for Changing Land Markets: The Case of Industrial Estates in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[2]  Christoph Knill,et al.  “Seek and Ye Shall Find!” , 2001 .

[3]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[4]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[5]  P. John,et al.  Path Dependency and the Reform of English Local Government , 2005 .

[6]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[7]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The transition in Dutch water management , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Bachrach,et al.  Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice , 1970 .

[9]  P. Pierson.  Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Rosamond Rhodes,et al.  Policy Networks , 1990 .

[11]  Sarah B. Pralle.  Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy , 2003, Journal of Public Policy.

[12]  Joop Koppenjan,et al.  Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector , 1997 .

[13]  Johannes T.A. Bressers,et al.  Integrated Governance and Water Basin Management , 2004 .

[14]  Explaining Continuity and Change in International Policies: Issue Linkage, Venue Change, and Learning on Policies for the River Scheldt Estuary 1967–2005 , 2008 .

[15]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change , 2000 .

[16]  B. Peters,et al.  The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism , 2005, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  William R. Lowry,et al.  Potential Focusing Projects and Policy Change , 2006 .

[18]  C. Weible,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework , 2012, Theories of the Policy Process.

[19]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  MANAGING TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[20]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[21]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[22]  Dave Huitema,et al.  Coupling strategies in water management: An exploration on the basis of literature from the policy sciences and related fields , 2006 .

[23]  M. Kaika.  The Water Framework Directive: A New Directive for a Changing Social, Political and Economic European Framework , 2003 .

[24]  N. Roberts,et al.  Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation , 1996 .

[25]  P. Sabatier.  Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[26]  F. Fischer.  Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices , 2003 .

[27]  L. Ross,et al.  Environmental policy in China , 1988 .

[28]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[29]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education * , 2001 .

[30]  Tim Beardsley,et al.  Shooting the Rapids , 1994 .

[31]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[32]  B. Jones.  The politics of attention , 2005 .

[33]  G. Stoker.  Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[34]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance, Politics and the State , 2000 .

[35]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[36]  T. Birkland.  After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events , 1997 .

[37]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Interpreting British Governance , 2003 .

[38]  M. Hajer.  Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE , 2005 .

[39]  P. Pierson.  Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program , 1992, International Organization.

[41]  P. Pierson.  Politics in time , 2004 .

[42]  S. Meijerink.  Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–20031 , 2005 .

[43]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Regels en sturing in netwerken : de invloed van netwerkregels op de herstructurering van naoorlogse wijken , 1996 .

[44]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organizing or Centrally Steered? , 2005 .

[45]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking , 2006 .

[46]  Peter John,et al.  Analysing Public Policy , 1998 .

[47]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[48]  A. Kay.  A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies , 2005 .

[49]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[50]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[51]  D. Eaton,et al.  The Short-Term and Long-Term Ramifications of Linkages Involving Natural Resources: The US – Mexico Transboundary Water Case , 2004 .

[52]  P. Haas.  Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination , 1992, International Organization.

[53]  J. Richardson,et al.  Why does policy change over time? Adversarial policy communities, alternative policy arenas, and British trunk roads policy 1945–95 , 1996 .

[54]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[55]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .