Aiding genetic analysts: Design of a literature evaluation system

This paper is concerned with the design of a system that handles published research literature evaluation related to clinical DNA sequencing and analysis of genetic variants. The literature handling system is part of a larger system, the Norwegian clinical genetic Analysis Platform, currently under development at the Department of Medical Genetics at Oslo University Hospital. The genAP project has inquired into data handling requirements, procedures and supportive bioinformatics tools for analysis of genetic data. Finding and evaluating relevant literature that reports on clinical classifications of genetic variants is an important part of this process. In many cases, it is a requirement to compare local assessments with those published in high-quality external references, ensuring that the correct decision on the clinical nature of the variant is reached. The implications of the decisions made as part of this process are relevant for both patients and knowledge production and its transferability. We chose to use user-centered design as our research approach, in both qualitative (walk-troughs, interviews and talk-aloud evaluations) and quantitative (questionnaire) inquiries. User involvement in design and evaluation of the reference handling prototype was important for identifying diverse usability problems and design issues, which could then be improved in later iterations of the prototype. These issues included identifying the most relevant articles for a particular genetic variant and communicating uncertainty in individual assessments. Users have also contributed to defining more general guidelines for the re-design of later versions, e.g., a need for customization, as users often have different strategies for working with references. We assert that user involvement in the design and evaluation processes, such as described in this paper, leads to system design that is more in tune with users’ needs, making the adoption and use of the system easier and improving the efficiency and quality of the analysis.

[1]  Helena Lindgren,et al.  Towards personalized decision support in the dementia domain based on clinical practice guidelines , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[2]  Alma Leora Culén,et al.  GenAP workbench: aiding variant classification in clinical diagnostic settings. , 2014 .

[3]  Vito Perrone,et al.  Better bioinformatics through usability analysis , 2009, Bioinform..

[4]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  Beyond power: making bioinformatics tools user-centered , 2004, CACM.

[5]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  MUST: A Method for Participatory Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  David W. Bates,et al.  Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  A. Spurdle,et al.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results , 2008, Human mutation.

[8]  G. Nolan,et al.  Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  E. Mardis The $1,000 genome, the $100,000 analysis? , 2010, Genome Medicine.

[10]  Rodrigo Dienstmann,et al.  Standardized decision support in next generation sequencing reports of somatic cancer variants , 2014, Molecular oncology.

[11]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[12]  Jorun Børsting Design of Genetic Classification Software: The Case of Representation of Research References , 2014 .

[13]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[14]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Make room for ethnography in design!: overlooked collaborative and educational prospects , 1998, ASTR.

[15]  A. Culén,et al.  Design of a Reference Handling System for Clinical DNA Sequencing Analysis , 2015 .

[16]  Wyeth W. Wasserman,et al.  Usability study of clinical exome analysis software: Top lessons learned and recommendations , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.