Evidence Gap Maps - a Tool for Promoting Evidence-Informed Policy and Prioritizing Future Research

Evidence-gap maps present a new addition to the tools available to support evidence-informed policy making. Evidence-gap maps are thematic evidence collections covering a range of issues such as maternal health, HIV/AIDS, and agriculture. They present a visual overview of existing systematic reviews or impact evaluations in a sector or subsector, schematically representing the types of interventions evaluated and outcomes reported. Gap maps enable policy makers and practitioners to explore the findings and quality of the existing evidence and facilitate informed judgment and evidence-based decision making in international development policy and practice. The gap map also identifies key"gaps"where little or no evidence from impact evaluations and systematic reviews is available and where future research should be focused. Thus, gap maps can be a useful tool for developing a strategic approach to building the evidence base in a particular sector. This paper provides an introduction to evidence-gap maps, outlines the gap-map methodology, and presents some examples.

[1]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge translation of research findings , 2012, Implementation Science.

[2]  Donna Ciliska,et al.  Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[3]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  John N. Lavis,et al.  How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[5]  M. Gaarder,et al.  Institutionalisation of government evaluation: balancing trade-offs , 2010 .

[6]  D. Gould,et al.  What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[7]  David Moher,et al.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[8]  Stephen Peckham,et al.  Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services , 2008, Health research policy and systems.

[9]  Linda M. Collins,et al.  Replication in Prevention Science , 2011, Prevention Science.

[10]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[11]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  The Evidence-Based Policing Matrix , 2011 .

[12]  The International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie): an introduction , 2009 .

[13]  Emma Tavender,et al.  The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[15]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where? , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[16]  T. Turner,et al.  Searches for evidence mapping: effective, shorter, cheaper. , 2011, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[17]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[18]  Janet Clapton,et al.  Systematic maps to support the evidence base in social care , 2007 .

[19]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[20]  Denise O'Connor,et al.  Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies , 2008 .

[21]  Stephen Platt,et al.  The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews , 2010, BMC public health.

[22]  L. Underwood,et al.  The effectiveness of interventions for people with common mental health problems on employment outcomes: a systematic rapid evidence assessment , 2007 .

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  J. Laws Getting to zero. , 2012, Occupational health & safety.

[25]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit , 2012 .

[26]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  The politics of evidence and methodology: lessons from the EPPI-Centre , 2005 .

[27]  A. Oxman,et al.  An overview of research on the effects of results-based financing , 2008 .

[28]  J. Harris,et al.  Services to Support Carers of People with Mental Health Problems , 2002 .

[29]  D. Gough,et al.  Commonality and diversity in reviews , 2012 .