Adaptive policymaking for Airport Strategic Planning

Airport Strategic Planning (ASP) focuses on developing plans for the long-term development of an airport. A crucial challenge in ASP is the treatment of uncertainty about relevant future developments (e.g., aviation demand, regulations, technological breakthroughs, etc.). Currently, ASP focuses on reducing demand uncertainties through forecasting. However, this approach ignores most of the uncertainties. As a result, the forecasts are practically always wrong. Still, most airports base their plans on such a forecast. As such, current ASP practice often results in serious negative consequences for the long-term development of an airport, including an inability to implement the plan, an inability to meet actual demand, and unnecessary investments in facilities. An alternative for handling uncertainty in ASP involves adaptive policymaking (APM). APM takes actions that might be needed right away and creates a framework for future actions that allows for adaptations over time as knowledge about the future becomes available. In this paper, we describe the problem of uncertainty in ASP in more detail, and present an example of the application of APM to the case of Schiphol Airport. We conclude that adaptive policymaking is a highly promising alternative to AMP that can avoid serious mistakes in airport planning.

[1]  Strategic Planning for Airport Capacity: an Appreciation of Australia's Process for Sydney , 2022 .

[2]  J. Cidell,et al.  SCALES OF AIRPORT EXPANSION: GLOBALIZATION, REGIONALIZATION, AND LOCAL LAND USE , 2004 .

[3]  Paul Stephen Dempsey,et al.  Denver International Airport: Lessons Learned , 1997 .

[4]  Stephan Barg,et al.  Designing policies in a world of uncertainty , change , and surprise Adaptive policy case study : analysis of Manitoba ’ s Conservation District policy , 2007 .

[5]  W. Walker Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector , 2000 .

[6]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Handbook of Systems Analysis: Overview of Uses, Procedures, Applications and Practice , 1986 .

[7]  Robert J Lempert,et al.  A new decision sciences for complex systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  The Political Impact of Technical Expertise , 1975 .

[10]  Guillaume Burghouwt,et al.  Deregulation and the Consequences for Airport Planning in Europe , 2003 .

[11]  J. Bryson What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[12]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  C. S. Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[14]  Andrew R. Goetz,et al.  Getting realistic about megaproject planning: The case of the new Denver International Airport , 1995 .

[15]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR AIRPORT CAPACITY , 1991 .

[16]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[17]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[19]  Kai N. Lee Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00 , 1993 .