Electroporation threshold, conductivity and memory effect in rat liver

Abstract Purpose The characterization of electroporation in biological tissues is an important aspect to understand the process, elaborate analytical or numerical models and prepare clinical protocols. A new technique is presented to separate the effects of intense dielectric dispersion in the tissues from the results due to electroporation. Methods Rat liver samples are accommodated in a parallel plate system, their admittance is measured and the electroporation protocol is applied. Results Experimental results of the intact tissue’s electrical properties are presented. The electroporation threshold with a voltage ramp decreased from 385 to 309 V/cm when the rise time of the applied field was reduced from 1000 μs to 200 μs. For a pulse train, the conductivity increased with each pulse and the memory effect was significant during time intervals from 1 millisecond to 6 seconds. Conclusion The use of the Fourier series enabled the separation of the sample’s dispersive effects, allowing for the evaluation of the electroporation effects and the determination of the electroporation threshold. The recovery time of the electroporated tissue is similar to that obtained for isolated cells.

[1]  John C. Bischof,et al.  A Review of Basic to Clinical Studies of Irreversible Electroporation Therapy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J. Gehl,et al.  Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. , 2003, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation of cells and tissues , 2000 .

[4]  E. McAdams,et al.  The linear and non-linear electrical properties of the electrode-electrolyte interface , 1995 .

[5]  H. Itoh,et al.  Electroporation of cell membrane visualized under a pulsed-laser fluorescence microscope. , 1988, Biophysical journal.

[6]  J Teissié,et al.  Time courses of mammalian cell electropermeabilization observed by millisecond imaging of membrane property changes during the pulse. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[7]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Cell electropermeabilization to small molecules in vitro: control by pulse parameters , 2001 .

[8]  Steve W. Smye,et al.  Membrane electroporation theories: a review , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  The contribution of lipid peroxidation to membrane permeability in electropermeabilization: A molecular dynamics study. , 2019, Bioelectrochemistry.

[10]  Susan Rae Smith-Baish,et al.  The dielectric properties of tissues , 1991 .

[11]  D. Chang 2 – Structure and Dynamics of Electric Field-Induced Membrane Pores as Revealed by Rapid-Freezing Electron Microscopy , 1991 .

[12]  L. Mir,et al.  Introduction of definite amounts of nonpermeant molecules into living cells after electropermeabilization: direct access to the cytosol. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[13]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Effect of Electric-Field Intensity on Electropermeabilization and Electrosensitmty of Various Tumor-Cell Lines In Vitro , 1998 .

[14]  L. Mir,et al.  Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part I. Increased efficiency of permeabilization. , 2001, Bioelectrochemistry.

[15]  Rafael V. Davalos,et al.  Experimental Characterization and Numerical Modeling of Tissue Electrical Conductivity during Pulsed Electric Fields for Irreversible Electroporation Treatment Planning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: from the drawing board into medical practice , 2014, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[17]  M. Rols,et al.  Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of ?) knowledge. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Membrane Electroporation and Electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and Models. , 2019, Annual review of biophysics.

[19]  Daniela O. H. Suzuki,et al.  Sinusoidal Signal Analysis of Electroporation in Biological Cells , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J Teissié,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[21]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Electric Field Distribution and Electroporation Threshold , 2016 .

[22]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment outcome , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Jing Zhu,et al.  A Review on Electroporation-Based Intracellular Delivery , 2018, Molecules.

[24]  J. Weaver,et al.  Theory of electroporation: A review , 1996 .