Electoral support for the 5 Star Movement in Milan: An ecological analysis of social and spatial factors

ABSTRACT After the 2018 general election, several scholars remarked on the failure of the 5 Star Movement (5SM) to increase its vote in Milan. While the role of demographic and socioeconomic factors has been highlighted, little attention has been devoted to spatial dynamics. The authors analyze the greater city of Milan using a new set of spatial units that capture the characteristics of the local populations which voted at specific polling stations. They regress support for the 5SM in each electoral district on a range of demographic, socioeconomic and spatial variables. The results show that more disadvantaged districts just outside the municipality have a strong propensity to support the 5SM. Many of the individuals and families living in these areas were negatively affected by economic crisis and continue to experience strain. These are not places of extreme marginality but have unsatisfied needs that are largely ignored by the traditional parties.

[1]  Lorenzo Mosca,et al.  Beyond left and right: the eclectic populism of the Five Star Movement , 2019, Varieties of Populism in Europe in Times of Crises.

[2]  A. Lindh,et al.  Class Position and Political Opinion in Rich Democracies , 2020, Annual Review of Sociology.

[3]  Francesco Duina,et al.  Not so right after all? Making sense of the progressive rhetoric of Europe’s far-right parties , 2020, International Sociology.

[4]  Lewis Dijkstra,et al.  The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area , 2019 .

[5]  M. Arlotti,et al.  Explaining subnational variations in early childhood education and care. A fuzzy‐set analysis of the Italian case , 2019, Social Policy & Administration.

[6]  P. Colloca,et al.  The Dynamics of the Electoral Geography of the Five Star Movement: The Role of Territorial Area and Municipality Size , 2019, Journal of Modern Italian Studies.

[7]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  The geography of EU discontent , 2019, Regional Studies.

[8]  Mario L. Small,et al.  The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties , 2019, Annual Review of Sociology.

[9]  P. Pierson,et al.  “Superstar Cities” & the Generation of Durable Inequality , 2019, Daedalus.

[10]  Jacqueline Jones,et al.  Disenfranchised Grief , 2019, The International Handbook of Art Therapy in Palliative and Bereavement Care.

[11]  Kenneth Bunker.  Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism , 2019, Democratization.

[12]  P. L. Galés,et al.  Tra tipi e forme. Perché la sociologia urbana deve lavorare sulle dinamiche , 2019 .

[13]  R. Sampson.  Neighbourhood effects and beyond: Explaining the paradoxes of inequality in the changing American metropolis , 2018, Urban Studies.

[14]  M. Maraffi.  The social stratification of the 2018 vote in Italy: between continuity and change , 2018, Contemporary Italian Politics.

[15]  R. Biorcio,et al.  Il Movimento 5 stelle: dalla protesta al governo , 2018 .

[16]  S. Musterd,et al.  Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods , 2018 .

[17]  Kasper M. Hansen,et al.  The Context of Voting: Does Neighborhood Ethnic Diversity Affect Turnout? , 2016 .

[18]  G. Bellettini,et al.  Neighborhood heterogeneity and electoral turnout , 2016 .

[19]  Brendan Gleeson,et al.  Urban studies after the age of the city , 2016 .

[20]  Lorenzo Zamponi,et al.  Direct Social Actions and Economic Crises: The Relationship between Forms of Action and Socio-Economic Context in Italy , 2015 .

[21]  J. Pratschke,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Area-Level Deprivation in Ireland, 1991–2011 , 2015 .

[22]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  European populism in the shadow of the great recession , 2015 .

[23]  F. Truglia.  L’Italia incantata. Geo-statistica della diffusione dell’astensionismo, elezioni politiche 2008 e 2013 , 2014 .

[24]  T. Vitale,et al.  Governing the large metropolis. A research agenda , 2013 .

[25]  M. Colleoni.  Mobility, Accessibility and Social Equity: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Empirical Study in the Metropolitan Areas of Milan, Bologna and Turin , 2013 .

[26]  Jacqueline Nivard,et al.  Redefining urban: a new way to measure metropolitan areas , 2012 .

[27]  B. Korf,et al.  Introduction: Space, contestation and the political , 2012 .

[28]  M. Barbagli,et al.  Dentro e fuori le mura. Città e gruppi sociali dal 1400 a oggi , 2012 .

[29]  B. Cousin,et al.  La division sociale de l'espace milanais : comparaison avec le cas parisien , 2008 .

[30]  R. A. Walks.  City–suburban electoral polarization in Great Britain, 1950–2001 , 2005 .

[31]  C. Propper,et al.  Spatial Scale and the Neighbourhood Effect: Multinomial Models of Voting at Two Recent British General Elections , 2005 .

[32]  D. Powers,et al.  Demography of Social Stratification , 2005 .

[33]  C. Mudde,et al.  The Populist Zeitgeist , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[34]  J. Agnew,et al.  City versus Metropolis: The Northern League in the Milan Metropolitan Area , 2002 .

[35]  Jamie Peck,et al.  Neoliberalizing Space , 2002 .

[36]  S. Greenland.  Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[37]  Yvette M. Alex‐Assensoh.  Neighborhoods, Family, and Political Behavior in Urban America , 1998 .

[38]  A. Pizzorno.  Le radici della politica assoluta e altri saggi , 1993 .

[39]  D. G. Evans,et al.  Detecting Voronoi (area-of-influence) polygons , 1987 .

[40]  M. Ravindranathan,et al.  STRUCTURAL EFFECTS I , 1977 .

[41]  L. Milbrath.  Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? , 1966 .