Identification of copy number gain and overexpressed genes on chromosome arm 20q by an integrative genomic approach in cervical cancer: Potential role in progression

Recurrent karyotypic abnormalities are a characteristic feature of cervical cancer (CC) cells, which may result in deregulated expression of important genes that contribute to tumor initiation and progression. To examine the role of gain of the long arm of chromosome 20 (20q), one of the common chromosomal gains in CC, we evaluated CC at various stages of progression using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, gene expression profiling, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. This analysis revealed copy number increase (CNI) of 20q in >50% of invasive CC and identified two focal amplicons at 20q11.2 and 20q13.13 in a subset of tumors. We further demonstrate that the acquisition of 20q gain occurs at an early stage in CC development and the high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) that exhibit 20q CNI are associated (P = 0.05) with persistence or progression to invasive cancer. We identified a total of 26 overexpressed genes as consequence of 20q gain (N = 14), as targets of amplicon 1 (N = 9; two genes also commonly expressed with 20q gain) and amplicon 2 (N = 6; one gene also commonly expressed with 20q gain). These include a number of functionally important genes in cell cycle regulation (E2F1, TPX2, KIF3B, PIGT, and B4GALT5), nuclear function (CSEL1), viral replication (PSMA7 and LAMA5), methylation and chromatin remodeling (ASXL1, AHCY, and C20orf20), and transcription regulation (TCEA2). Our findings implicate a role for these genes in CC tumorigenesis, represent an important step toward the development of clinically significant biomarkers, and form a framework for testing as molecular therapeutic targets. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  K. Basso,et al.  Gene dosage alterations revealed by cDNA microarray analysis in cervical cancer: Identification of candidate amplified and overexpressed genes , 2007, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[2]  A. Ostör Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. , 1993, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[3]  J. Gray,et al.  Amplification of chromosomal region 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: prognostic implications. , 1995, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[4]  M. Schwab Oncogene amplification in solid tumors. , 1999, Seminars in cancer biology.

[5]  Elena Savelieva,et al.  20q gain associates with immortalization: 20q13.2 amplification correlates with genome instability in human papillomavirus 16 E7 transformed human uroepithelial cells , 1997, Oncogene.

[6]  M. Mansukhani,et al.  Genetic analysis identifies putative tumor suppressor sites at 2q35–q36.1 and 2q36.3–q37.1 involved in cervical cancer progression , 2003, Oncogene.

[7]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Independent amplification and frequent co-amplification of three nonsyntenic regions on the long arm of chromosome 20 in human breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[8]  G. Evans,et al.  Identification of a 6-cM minimal deletion at 11q23.1-23.2 and exclusion of PPP2R1B gene as a deletion target in cervical cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[9]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  Genome Amplification of Chromosome 20 in Breast Cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  E. Jordanova,et al.  Gene-specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis on tissue microarray to refine the region of chromosome 20q amplification in melanoma , 2007, Melanoma research.

[11]  Cheng Li,et al.  dChipSNP: significance curve and clustering of SNP-array-based loss-of-heterozygosity data , 2004, Bioinform..

[12]  A. Östör,et al.  Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. , 1993, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[13]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Hybrid selection of transcribed sequences from microdissected DNA: isolation of genes within amplified region at 20q11-q13.2 in breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[14]  Karl Münger,et al.  Mechanisms of genomic instability in human cancer: Insights from studies with human papillomavirus oncoproteins , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[15]  R. Richart,et al.  Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1967 .

[16]  C J L M Meijer,et al.  Increased gene copy numbers at chromosome 20q are frequent in both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the cervix , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[17]  Bhuvanesh Singh,et al.  Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic characterization of cervical cancer cell lines , 2003, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[18]  S. Peñuelas,et al.  Differentially expressed genes between high-risk human papillomavirus types in human cervical cancer cells , 2006, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[19]  L. G. Koss,et al.  Cervical Cancer , 1981, Current Topics in Pathology.

[20]  P. Rao,et al.  Chromosomal amplifications, 3q gain and deletions of 2q33-q37 are the frequent genetic changes in cervical carcinoma , 2004, BMC Cancer.

[21]  Karl Münger,et al.  Human papillomavirus immortalization and transformation functions. , 2002, Virus research.

[22]  C. Li,et al.  Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  E. Schröck,et al.  Gain of chromosome 3q defines the transition from severe dysplasia to invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Ishikawa,et al.  Molecular karyotyping of human hepatocellular carcinoma using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays , 2006, Oncogene.

[25]  N. Carter,et al.  High-resolution analysis of genomic copy number alterations in bladder cancer by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization , 2004, Oncogene.

[26]  J. Rader,et al.  Profiling microdissected epithelium and stroma to model genomic signatures for cervical carcinogenesis accommodating for covariates. , 2007, Cancer research.

[27]  R. Chaganti,et al.  ERBB2 (HER2/neu) oncogene is frequently amplified in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1994, Cancer research.

[28]  D. K. Das,et al.  Risk factors related to biological behaviour of precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  C. Reznikoff,et al.  Dominant genetic alterations in immortalization: Role for 20q gain , 1999, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[30]  V. Reuter,et al.  Chromosomal amplification is associated with cisplatin resistance of human male germ cell tumors. , 1998, Cancer research.

[31]  N. Christensen,et al.  Keratinocyte-Secreted Laminin 5 Can Function as a Transient Receptor for Human Papillomaviruses by Binding Virions and Transferring Them to Adjacent Cells , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[32]  L. Koutsky,et al.  Natural history and epidemiological features of genital HPV infection. , 1992, IARC scientific publications.

[33]  M. Mansukhani,et al.  Frequent Promoter Methylation of CDH1, DAPK, RARB, and HIC1 Genes in Carcinoma of Cervix Uteri: Its Relationship to Clinical Outcome , 2003, Molecular Cancer.

[34]  Ekaterina S Jordanova,et al.  Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[35]  K. Maclennan,et al.  Genetic events during the transformation of a tamoxifen-sensitive human breast cancer cell line into a drug-resistant clone. , 2001, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[36]  M. Newton,et al.  Long-term genome stability and minimal genotypic and phenotypic alterations in HPV16 E7-, but not E6-, immortalized human uroepithelial cells. , 1994, Genes & development.