Permeable Breakwaters Performance Modeling: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques

The advantage of permeable breakwaters over more traditional types has attracted great interest in the behavior of these structures in the field of engineering. The main objective of this study is to apply 19 well-known machine learning regressors to derive the best model of innovative breakwater hydrodynamic behavior with reflection and transmission coefficients as the target parameters. A database of 360 laboratory tests on the low-scale breakwater is used to establish the model. The proposed models link the reflection and transmission coefficients to seven dimensionless parameters, including relative chamber width, relative rockfill height, relative chamber width in terms of wavelength, wave steepness, wave number multiplied by water depth, and relative wave height in terms of rockfill height. For the validation of the models, the cross-validation method was used for all models except the multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) and genetic programming (GP) models. To validate the MLP and GP, the database is divided into three categories: training, validation, and testing. Furthermore, two explicit functional relationships are developed by utilizing the GP for each target. The exponential Gaussian process regression (GPR) model in predicting the reflection coefficient (R2 = 0.95, OBJ function = 0.0273), and similarly, the exponential GPR model in predicting the transmission coefficient (R2 = 0.98, OBJ function = 0.0267) showed the best performance and the highest correlation with the actual records and can further be used as a reference for engineers in practical work. Also, the sensitivity analysis of the proposed models determined that the relative height parameter of the rockfill material has the greatest contribution to the introduced breakwater behavior.

[1]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  Prediction of principal ground-motion parameters using a hybrid method coupling artificial neural networks and simulated annealing , 2011 .

[2]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing , 2016 .

[3]  Suman Kundapura,et al.  Below the Data Range Prediction of Soft Computing Wave Reflection of Semicircular Breakwater , 2019, Journal of Marine Science and Application.

[4]  A. P. Shashikala,et al.  Estimation of friction coefficient for double walled permeable vertical breakwater , 2018 .

[5]  M. Koc,et al.  Prediction of the pH and the temperature-dependent swelling behavior of Ca2+-alginate hydrogels by artificial neural networks , 2008 .

[6]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[7]  Michael Blumenstein,et al.  Near-shore swell estimation from a global wind-wave model: Spectral process, linear, and artificial neural network models , 2007 .

[8]  B. Pradhan,et al.  A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility , 2017 .

[9]  A. Gandomi,et al.  Modeling of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of stabilized soil using artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[10]  M. Elbisy Estimation of regular wave run-up on slopes of perforated coastal structures constructed on sloping beaches , 2015 .

[11]  Subba Rao,et al.  Prediction of wave transmission over submerged reef of tandem breakwater using PSO-SVM and PSO-ANN techniques , 2018, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.

[12]  A. Cancelliere,et al.  Significant wave height record extension by neural networks and reanalysis wind data , 2015 .

[13]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Nonstationary hydrological time series forecasting using nonlinear dynamic methods , 2005 .

[14]  A. P. Shashikala,et al.  Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Vertical Cellular Breakwater , 2017 .

[15]  Can Elmar Balas,et al.  Stability assessment of rubble-mound breakwaters using genetic programming , 2016 .

[16]  Maurizio Brocchini,et al.  Prediction of scour depth at breakwaters due to non-breaking waves using machine learning approaches , 2017 .

[17]  Akbar Karimi,et al.  Multi-objective optimumA design of double-layer perforated-wall breakwaters: Application of NSGA-II and bargaining models , 2014 .

[18]  A. Koraim,et al.  Hydrodynamic performance of double rows of piles suspending horizontal c shaped bars , 2014 .

[19]  Wen-Kai Weng,et al.  The performance characteristics of inclined highly pervious pipe breakwaters , 2015 .

[20]  Abdelazim M. Negm,et al.  Determination of Wave Reflection Formulae for Vertical and Sloped Seawalls Via Experimental Modelling , 2016 .

[21]  A. S. Koraim,et al.  Hydraulic performance of vertical walls with horizontal slots used as breakwater , 2010 .

[22]  Zhenghua Huang Wave interaction with one or two rows of closely spaced rectangular cylinders , 2007 .

[23]  Lida Rasoul Ahari,et al.  Prediction of non-breaking wave induced scour depth at the trunk section of breakwaters using Genetic Programming and Artificial Neural Networks , 2017 .

[24]  H. Md. Azamathulla,et al.  Assessment of M5′ model tree and classification and regression trees for prediction of scour depth below free overfall spillways , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[25]  H. K. Cigizoglu,et al.  Artificial intelligence methods in breakwater damage ratio estimation , 2005 .

[26]  E. Mlybari,et al.  Hydrodynamic performance of multiple-row slotted breakwaters , 2016 .

[27]  Tsugio Kono,et al.  WAVE DEFORMATION ON A BARRIER REEF , 1981 .