Lancaster's characteristics approach revisited: product selection using non-parametric methods

In consumer theory, the principles of Lancaster's characteristics approach and hedonic pricing appear to offer the most promising insight into choice when qualitative aspects are important. The paper reconciles these principles with the family of non-parametric frontier estimation methods known as data envelopment analysis. It is shown that, with some straightforward adjustments, DEA is entirely consistent with the characteristics view of consumer choice found in the economics literature. In making Lancaster's ideas operational, the paper also addresses the theoretical concern voiced by Lancaster about combining indivisible products. The principles are illustrated with a case study involving the comparison of diesel cars. The paper concludes that the user will ultimately have to apply some judgement in choosing between competing efficient products. However, the analysis should help to restrict the number of products to be assessed to manageable proportions. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data development analysis , 1986 .

[7]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[8]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[9]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[11]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  G. Walshe,et al.  Managing Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[14]  John A. Henning,et al.  The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution , 1967 .

[15]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Comparing products using data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[17]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making , 1993 .

[18]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Variety, equity, and efficiency , 1979 .