Examination of the effectiveness of far-field mathematical absorber reflection suppression in a CATR through computational electromagnetic simulation

For a little over a decade now, a measurement and post-processing technique named Mathematical Absorber Reflection Suppression (MARS) has been used successfully to identify and then suppress range multi-path effects in spherical [1, 2, 3, 4], cylindrical [5, 6, 7] & planar [8, 9] near-field antenna measurement systems and far-field [10] and compact antenna test ranges [11] with a detailed theoretical treatment being presented in [12]. Much of this early work concentrated on verification by empirical testing however some corroboration was obtained with the use of computational electromagnetic simulations that considered far-field [13] and subsequently near-field cases [14]. The recent development of a highly accurate computational electromagnetic simulation tool that permits the simulation of “measured” far-field pattern data as obtained from using a compact antenna test range (CATR) [15] has for the first time permitted the careful verification of the far-field MARS technique for a given AUT and CATR combination. For the first time, this paper presents simulated “measured” far-field pattern data in the presence of a large scatterer and then verifies the successful extraction of the scattering artefacts using standard FF-MARS processing. Results are presented and discussed.

[1]  Greg Hindman,et al.  REFLECTION SUPPRESSION IN LARGE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD RANGE , 2005 .

[2]  Greg Hindman SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SELF-COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS , 2004 .

[3]  A. C. Newell,et al.  Error analysis techniques for planar near-field measurements , 1988 .

[4]  A. Newell,et al.  EXTENSION OF THE MATHEMATICAL ABSORBER REFLECTION SUPPRESSION TECHNIQUE TO THE PLANAR NEAR-FIELD GEOMETRY , 2010 .

[5]  C. G. Parini,et al.  CATR Quiet Zone Modelling and the Prediction of “ Measured ” Radiation Pattern Errors : Comparison using a Variety of Electromagnetic Simulation Methods , 2015 .

[6]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  Asymptotic and full wave simulation models for compensated compact range design and analysis , 2013, 2013 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC).

[7]  A. Newell,et al.  Reflection Suppression in cylindrical near-field measurements of electrically small antennas , 2009, 2009 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference.

[8]  S. F. Gregson,et al.  Advances in cylindrical Mathematical Absorber Reflection Suppression , 2010, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  S. F. Gregson,et al.  Behaviour of orthogonal wave functions and the correction of antenna measurements taken in non-anechoic environments , 2013, 2013 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC).

[10]  Doren W. Hess The IsoFiltertrade technique: isolating an individual radiator from spherical near-field data measured in a contaminated environment , 2007 .

[11]  Nearfield,et al.  REFLECTION SUPPRESSION TO IMPROVE ANECHOIC CHAMBER PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[12]  A.C. Newell,et al.  APplication Of Mathematical Absorber Reflection suppression to planar near-field antenna measurements , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[13]  S.F. Gregson,et al.  Application of Mathematical Absorber Reflection Suppression to far-field antenna measurements , 2011, 2011 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference.

[14]  Janse van Rensburg,et al.  Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements , 2014 .

[15]  Clive Parini,et al.  Spherical near-field antenna measurements , 2014, Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, 2nd Expanded Edition, Volume 2.

[16]  Stuart Gregson,et al.  Examination of Far-Field Mathematical Absorber Reflection Suppression through Computational Electromagnetic Simulation , 2012 .

[17]  Stuart Gregson,et al.  REFLECTION SUPPRESSION IN CYLINDRICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS – CYLINDRICAL MARS , 2009 .