An effective utilization management strategy by dual approach of influencing physician ordering and gate keeping.

OBJECTIVES There is increasing recognition of the importance of appropriate laboratory test utilization. We investigate the effect of a multifaceted educational approach that includes physician feedback on individual test ordering, in conjunction with targeted restriction, on the utilization of selected laboratory tests. DESIGN AND METHODS Scientific evidence was compiled on the usefulness and limitations of tests suspected of being over utilized in our laboratories. A variety of approaches were used to deliver education on each of the targeted tests, with greater focus on primary care physicians (PCPs). Feedback on requesting behavior of these tests was also communicated to the latter group which included an educational component. Laboratory based restriction of testing was also exercised, including the unbundling of our electrolyte panel. RESULTS PCP requesting patterns for the selected tests were found to be markedly skewed. The interventions implemented over the study period resulted in a substantial 51% reduction in overall ordering of five of the targeted tests equating to an annual marginal cost saving of $60,124. Unbundling of the electrolyte panel resulted in marginal cost savings that equated annually to $42,500 on chloride and $48,000 on total CO2. CONCLUSIONS A multifaceted educational approach combined with feedback on utilization and laboratory driven gate-keeping significantly reduced the number of laboratory tests suspected of being redundant or unjustifiably requested. Laboratory professionals are well positioned to manage demand on laboratory tests by utilizing evidence base in developing specific test ordering directives and gate-keeping rules.

[1]  K Dumbaugh,et al.  A successful experiment to reduce unnecessary laboratory use in a community hospital. , 1988, Medical care.

[2]  Brian R. Jackson,et al.  Primary Care Physicians' Challenges in Ordering Clinical Laboratory Tests and Interpreting Results , 2014, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[3]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[4]  G Sandler,et al.  Costs of unnecessary tests. , 1979, British medical journal.

[5]  P Axt-Adam,et al.  Influencing Behavior of Physicians Ordering Laboratory Tests: A Literature Study , 1993, Medical care.

[6]  M. Laurant,et al.  The effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[7]  E. Kilpatrick,et al.  Tumour markers: their use and misuse by clinicians , 2003, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[8]  D. Bareford,et al.  Inappropriate use of laboratory services: long term combined approach to modify request patterns. , 1990, BMJ.

[9]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Long‐term effects of an education programme on the optimal use of clinical chemistry testing in primary health care , 2009, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[10]  C. Price Evidence-based laboratory medicine: supporting decision-making. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  W S A Smellie,et al.  Is clinical practice variability the major reason for differences in pathology requesting patterns in general practice? , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  R. Winkens,et al.  Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? , 2004, Family practice.

[13]  M H Liang,et al.  Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  Craig Ramsay,et al.  Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Rodin,et al.  Prudent laboratory usage, cost containment, and high quality medical care: are they compatible? , 1987, Human pathology.

[16]  T L Lincoln,et al.  Ready! Fire! . . . Aim! An inquiry into laboratory test ordering. , 1983, JAMA.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Evidence-based medicine , 1991 .

[19]  Pim M W Janssens,et al.  Managing the demand for laboratory testing: options and opportunities. , 2010, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[20]  Robert J. Glaser,et al.  Misuse of laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. Fryer,et al.  Managing demand for pathology tests: financial imperative or duty of care? , 2009, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[22]  Christopher P. Price,et al.  Applying Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine: A Step-By-Step Guide , 2009 .

[23]  C. van Walraven,et al.  Effect of a controlled feedback intervention on laboratory test ordering by community physicians. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  P. Rust,et al.  The Effect of Physician Personality on Laboratory Test Ordering for Hypertensive Patients , 1988, Medical care.

[25]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[26]  G. Dinant,et al.  Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice , 2006, BMC family practice.

[27]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Exploring the black box of change in improving test-ordering routines. , 2008, Family practice.