The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks.

Three experiments were designed to examine whether task complexity determines the degree to which a division of processing across the hemispheres (i.e., across-hemisphere processing) underlies performance when within- and across-hemisphere processing are equally possible. When task complexity was relatively low, performance in a midline condition that allowed for either within- or across-hemispheric processing resembled within-hemisphere performance (Experiments 1 and 2). However, when task complexity was high, performance in a midline condition (Experiments 1 and 2) and a lateralized condition, which also allowed for either within- or across-hemisphere processing (Experiment 3), resembled across-hemisphere performance. Results complement and extend prior work (e.g., M. T. Banich & A. Belger, 1990) by indicating that the degree to which interhemispheric cooperation underlies performance changes with the complexity of the task being performed. This finding suggests that the hemispheres dynamically couple or uncouple their processing as a function of task complexity.

[1]  P. Roland,et al.  Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. , 1993 .

[3]  R. Sperry.  Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[4]  D. Boles.  Fast visual generation: Its nature and chronometrics , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Banich,et al.  A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: evidence from the auditory and tactile modality , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Morihiro Sugishita,et al.  Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Abstraction and The Process of Recognition , 1970 .

[9]  T. Ludwig,et al.  The Bilateral Field Advantage on a Letter-Matching Task , 1993, Cortex.

[10]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and skill acquisition: learning-performance distinctions. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[11]  Louise Stanczak,et al.  Neural Recruitment and Cognitive Aging: Two Hemispheres Are Better Than One, Especially as You Age , 1999 .

[12]  M. Banich,et al.  Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. , 1994 .

[13]  Malcolm A. Jeeves,et al.  Bilateral visual field processing and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Banich,et al.  An unbalanced distribution of inputs across the hemispheres facilitates interhemispheric interaction , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[15]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society , 1997 .

[16]  M. Banich.  The Missing Link: The Role of Interhemispheric Interaction in Attentional Processing , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  J. Hellige.  Interhemispheric Interaction: Models, Paradigms and Recent Findings , 1987 .

[18]  K Yoshizaki,et al.  Benefits of Interhemispheric Integration on the Japanese Kana Script-Matching Tasks , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  A. Friedman,et al.  Hemispheres as independent resource systems: limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. , 1981 .

[20]  A. Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  S. Petersen,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding , 1998, Neuron.

[22]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric Interaction: How Do the Hemispheres Divide and Conquer a Task? , 1990, Cortex.

[23]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Are deconnected cerebral hemispheres independent channels? A preliminary study of the effect of unilateral loading on bilateral finger tapping. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. T. Reinitz,et al.  Division of inputs between hemispheres eliminates illusory conjunctions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Banich,et al.  The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: evidence from bihemispheric processing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  K. Luh,et al.  Interhemispheric Cooperation: Left Is Left and Right Is Right, but Sometimes the Twain Shall Meet , 1995 .

[28]  M. Banich,et al.  Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Visual laterality for letter comparison: Effects of stimulus factors, response factors, and metacontrol , 1989 .

[30]  E. Zaidel,et al.  Letter Matching within and between the Disconnected Hemispheres , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  J. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry for Processing Unpronounceable and Pronounceable Letter Trigrams , 1994, Brain and Language.

[32]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[33]  D B Boles,et al.  Visual and phonetic codes and the process of generation in letter matching. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[35]  A Belger,et al.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[36]  D. Whitteridge.  Movements of the eyes R. H. S. Carpenter, Pion Ltd, London (1977), 420 pp., $27.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Hellige,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Liederman,et al.  Subtraction in addition to addition: dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres. , 1986, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.