Increasing Rejection of Intimate Partner Violence

This study extends existing world society research on ideational diffusion by going beyond examinations of national policy change to investigate the spread of ideas among nonelite individuals. Specifically, I test whether recent trends in women’s attitudes about intimate partner violence are converging toward global cultural scripts. Results suggest that global norms regarding violence against women are reaching citizens worldwide, including in some of the least privileged parts of the globe. During the first decade of the 2000s, women in 23 of the 26 countries studied became more likely to reject intimate partner violence. Structural socioeconomic or demographic changes, such as urbanization, rising educational attainment, increasing media access, and cohort replacement, fail to explain the majority of the observed trend. Rather, women of all ages and social locations became less likely to accept justifications for intimate partner violence. The near uniformity of the trend and speed of the change in attitudes about intimate partner violence suggest that global cultural diffusion has played an important role.

[1]  J. True,et al.  Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming , 2001 .

[2]  R. Lesthaeghe,et al.  Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change , 1988 .

[3]  K. Yount.  Resources, Family Organization, and Domestic Violence against Married Women in Minya, Egypt. , 2005 .

[4]  Susannah Ottaway.  Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life , 2006 .

[5]  Melanie M. Hughes,et al.  The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, , 2006 .

[6]  K. Mason.  Explaining fertility transitions , 1997, Demography.

[7]  D. O’Byrne.  Human Rights in a Globalizing World , 2015 .

[8]  T. McDowell.  Family in the Middle East: Ideational Change in Egypt, Iran, and Tunisia , 2009 .

[9]  D. Alwin.  Cohort Replacement and Changes in Parental Socialization Values. , 1990 .

[10]  P. Ingram,et al.  The Global Rise of Democracy , 2010 .

[11]  Mala Htun,et al.  The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005 , 2012, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Melanie M. Hughes,et al.  The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003 , 2006 .

[13]  C. Chimbwete,et al.  The evolution of population policies in Kenya and Malawi , 2005 .

[14]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[15]  Nitza Berkovitch.  From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women's Rights and International Organizations , 1999 .

[16]  E. Doheny.  United States Agency for International Development , 2011 .

[17]  John Boli,et al.  World culture in the world polity : A century of international non-governmental organization , 1997 .

[18]  R. Hornik,et al.  Mass media and fertility change. , 2001 .

[19]  F. O. Ramirez,et al.  The changing logic of political citizenship : Cross-national acquisition of women's suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990 , 1997 .

[20]  A. Thornton.  The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change , 2001, Demography.

[21]  L. Subaiya,et al.  Understanding women's empowerment: a comparative analysis of demographic and health surveys (DHS) data , 2008 .

[22]  E. Boyle.  Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community , 2002 .

[23]  L. Pritchett,et al.  Estimating Wealth Effects Without Expenditure Data—Or Tears: An Application To Educational Enrollments In States Of India* , 2001, Demography.

[24]  David John Frank,et al.  The Global Dimensions of Rape-Law Reform: A Cross-National Study of Policy Outcomes , 2009 .

[25]  P. Norris,et al.  Islamic Culture and Democracy: Testing the 'Clash of Civilizations' Thesis , 2002 .

[26]  N. Ryder.  The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[27]  K. Bradley,et al.  The Globalization of Women's Status: Consensus/Dissensus in the World Polity , 1999 .

[28]  Ann Hironaka,et al.  The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[29]  Gertrude Fester,et al.  WOMEN'S RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS , 1994 .

[30]  E. Boyle,et al.  National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws , 2000 .

[31]  L. Heise.  Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework. , 1998, Violence against women.

[32]  John W. Meyer.  World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor , 2010 .

[33]  John W. Meyer,et al.  The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency* , 2000 .

[34]  John W. Meyer,et al.  World Society and the Nation‐State , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Stacy K. Mcgoldrick,et al.  Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice , 2007 .

[36]  S. Watkins,et al.  Reactions of developing-country elites to international population policy. , 2002 .

[37]  John Cleland,et al.  Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View , 1987 .

[38]  G. Firebaugh.  Where does social change come from? , 1992 .

[39]  Lori Heise,et al.  Violence by intimate partners. , 2002 .

[40]  A. Tsui,et al.  Policy as Symbolic Statement: International Response to National Population Policies , 1999 .

[41]  D. Shalala,et al.  Women's rights are human rights. , 1998, Global issues.

[42]  John B. Casterline,et al.  Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives , 2001 .

[43]  O. Uthman,et al.  Bmc International Health and Human Rights Factors Associated with Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women: a Comparative Analysis of 17 Sub-saharan Countries , 2008 .

[44]  Lilani Kumaranayake,et al.  Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. , 2006, Health policy and planning.

[45]  Hwaji Shin,et al.  Global Norms, Local Activism, and Social Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights and Resident Koreans in Japan , 2008 .

[46]  R. Lesthaeghe.  A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe , 1983 .

[47]  P. Levitt,et al.  Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women's rights in Peru, China, India and the United States , 2009 .

[48]  K. Yount,et al.  Women's "Justification" of Domestic Violence in Egypt , 2009 .

[49]  David John Frank,et al.  Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005 , 2010 .

[50]  F. O. Ramirez,et al.  National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966-2004 , 2009 .

[51]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Methods for estimating cohort replacement effects. , 1989, Sociological methodology.

[52]  Wesley Longhofer,et al.  National and Global Origins of Environmental Association , 2010 .

[53]  E. Hafner-Burton,et al.  Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  John W. Meyer.  World Expansion of Mass Education, 1870-1980 , 1992 .

[55]  Kristin C. Carbone-López,et al.  Movement Frames and African Women's Explanations for Opposing Female Genital Cutting , 2006 .

[56]  M. Hynes,et al.  Response effects to attitudinal questions about domestic violence against women: A comparative perspective , 2011 .

[57]  A. Thornton,et al.  International Family Change : Ideational Perspectives , 2012 .