Effecting an Improvement to the Fitness Function. How to Evolve a More Identifiable Face

Constructing the face of a criminal from the selection of individual facial parts is a hard task. We have been working on a new system called EvoFIT that involves the selection and breeding of complete faces. The approach is theoretically better founded and produces more identifiable composites than those from a traditional 'feature' system. In the current paper, we explored three new methods of presenting faces to a person using EvoFIT. A better quality face was evolved if (1) the external parts of the face were subjected to a Gaussian blur, allowing a user to focus on the important inner region of the face, (2) if the faces were simplified to make them sketch-like in appearance, and (3) if users took longer in deciding which faces to select for breeding. Taken together, these approaches would appear to make a marked improvement in the ability to evolve an identifiable likeness of a target.

[1]  Christopher J. Solomon,et al.  Synthesis of Photographic Quality Facial Composites using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2003, BMVC.

[2]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  H. Leder Line Drawings of Faces Reduce Configural Processing , 1996, Perception.

[4]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  An application of caricature: How to improve the recognition of facial composites , 2007 .

[5]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites , 2004, TAP.

[6]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  Evolving the Face of a Criminal: How to Search a Face Space More Effectively , 2007 .

[7]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[8]  P. Hancock,et al.  An evaluation of US systems for facial composite production , 2007, Ergonomics.

[9]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. , 2005 .

[10]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  Adding holistic dimensions to a facial composite system , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives , 1984 .

[13]  David Nunez,et al.  An evaluation of ID: an eigenface based construction system , 2006, South Afr. Comput. J..

[14]  G. Davies,et al.  Face recall: an examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. , 1982, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  P J Hancock,et al.  Evolving faces from principal components , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[16]  V. Bruce,et al.  Parallel approaches to composite production: interfaces that behave contrary to expectation , 2007, Ergonomics.

[17]  G Davies,et al.  Facial composite production: a comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  H D Ellis,et al.  Remembering faces: acknowledging our limitations. , 1978, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[19]  N. Steblay A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect , 1992 .

[20]  Jackie Phahlamohlaka,et al.  Amartya Sen's Capability Approach applied to Information Systems research , 2006, South Afr. Comput. J..

[21]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  Improving Target Identification Using Pairs of Composite Faces Constructed by the Same Person , 2006 .

[22]  Nancy K. Steblay,et al.  Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic Comparison , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[23]  Charlie David Frowd,et al.  EvoFIT: A Holistic, Evolutionary Facial Imaging System , 2002 .

[24]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Charlie D. Frowd,et al.  A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems , 2005 .

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  The importance of ‘mass’ in line drawings of faces , 1992 .