Comparison of coronal bacterial leakage between immediate versus delayed post-space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon/Epiphany.

AIM To compare the sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany after immediate versus delayed post-space preparation using an ex vivo bacterial leakage model. METHODOLOGY Eighty extracted, decoronated, single-rooted human maxillary teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups and two control groups (n = 20). Root canals were prepared in a standard manner with Sequence nickel-titanium rotary files to a final apical size of 50, .06 taper. Root canals in the experimental groups were filled with Resilon/Epiphany using a warm vertical compaction technique. In group 1, the post-space was prepared immediately and in group 2 the post-space was prepared 5 days later. Positive controls were filled with Resilon master cones without sealer. The negative controls were not obturated but the entire root surface including the orifices and foramina were sealed with fingernail polish. Leakage was examined at different time intervals using a dual-chamber bacterial microleakage model. The marker microorganism used was Streptococcus mutans. RESULTS All positive controls leaked within 3 days. All negative controls showed no leakage at each time interval. All experimental specimens leaked within 14 days. Statistical analysis showed that there was no difference in microleakage between the two experimental groups at each time interval. CONCLUSION In this ex vivo study, there was no significant difference between immediate and delayed post-space preparation using Resilon/Epiphany. Both groups failed to provide an adequate apical seal regardless of the timing of the post-space preparation.

[1]  F. Tay,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of the apical seal in Resilon/Epiphany and Gutta-Percha/AH Plus-filled root canals by using a fluid filtration approach. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  J. Bahcall,et al.  An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  E. Bodrumlu,et al.  Influence of immediate and delayed post space preparation on sealing ability of resilon. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[4]  Mônica Sampaio do Vale,et al.  Comparison of apical leakage between canals filled with gutta-percha/AH-Plus and the Resilon/Epiphany System, when submitted to two filling techniques. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Interfacial adaptation of adhesive materials to root canal dentin. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  Cecil E. Brown,et al.  Push-out bond strength of a new endodontic obturation system (Resilon/Epiphany). , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  H Shemesh,et al.  Leakage along apical root fillings with and without smear layer using two different leakage models: a two-month longitudinal ex vivo study. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[8]  E. Onay,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a new resin-based root canal obturation system. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  J. Bahcall,et al.  An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  E. Blignaut,et al.  Coronal leakage of teeth root-filled with gutta-percha or Resilon root canal filling material. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  E. Bodrumlu,et al.  Assessment of the sealing ability of a new root canal obturation material. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  D. Pashley,et al.  An in vitro assessment of the sealing ability of resilon/epiphany using fluid filtration. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  M. Apicella,et al.  A fluid filtration comparison of gutta-percha versus Resilon, a new soft resin endodontic obturation system. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  F. Tay,et al.  Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  G. Hartwell,et al.  Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using AH Plus sealer. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  Franklin R Tay,et al.  Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  Richard S Schwartz,et al.  Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Coronal leakage along apical root fillings after immediate and delayed post space preparation. , 1999, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[20]  E. Saunders,et al.  An evaluation of microbial coronal leakage in the restored pulp chamber of root-canal treated multirooted teeth. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[21]  C. Goodacre,et al.  The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part III. Tooth preparation considerations. , 1995, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  S. Madison,et al.  Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. , 1984, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  G. Harrington,et al.  The effect of immediate post preparation on apical seal. , 1981, Journal of endodontics.