Evaluation of environmental friendliness of concrete paving eco-blocks using LCA approach

PurposeThe demand for green construction materials and eco-products is burgeoning globally due to the shortage of natural materials and the relevant environmental consequences of natural materials. In addition, the management of rapidly increasing construction and demolition (C&D) waste and waste glass is in serious concern due to the shortage of landfills and associated environmental burdens for landfill disposal. Concrete paving eco-blocks using recycled materials derived from locally generated C&D waste and waste glass have been developed in Hong Kong and achieved its current advanced form with the continuous improvement. Therefore, this study aims to assess and compare the environmental impacts and sustainability associated with the natural blocks manufactured with virgin materials and three generations of the eco-blocks manufactured with recycled C&D waste and waste glass by the lifecycle assessment (LCA) techniques.MethodsFor evaluating the environmental performance of concrete paving blocks, the IMPACT 2002+ method was used for lifecycle impact assessment with the functional unit of 1 t of blocks production. This study considered the “cradle-to-site” system boundary, which includes raw material extraction/production, raw material collection and transport to blocks manufacturing site, blocks manufacturing, and transport of the produced blocks to use sites. First-hand data were collected from a local eco-block manufacturer. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for different raw material inputs to investigate the variation of the results.Results and discussionThe findings demonstrated that as compared to the natural blocks, the eco-blocks consumed 26–32 % lower energy, emitted 17–20 % lower greenhouse gases (GHG) in CO2 eq. as global warming potential, 22–29 % lower SO2 eq. as acidification potential, and 20–26 % lower PM2.5 eq. as respiratory inorganics potential, depending on the types of eco-blocks. The proposed manufacturing process has the higher savings for all impacts categories for the eco-blocks. In addition, second generation eco-blocks induced the lowest impacts compared to other two types of eco-blocks.ConclusionsIn summary, the eco-blocks have significant environmental gains which could help minimize the waste management problem, reduce natural resource depletion, and promote green consumption. The paper provides a method to facilitate the construction industry to choose sustainable materials to minimize environmental damages and promote the sustainable management of wastes. In addition to establishing a basis for choosing materials, the paper compares alternative manufacturing processes of concrete paving blocks for promoting green construction.

[1]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile , 2011 .

[2]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  TiO2-based self-compacting glass mortar: Comparison of photocatalytic nitrogen oxide removal and bacteria inactivation , 2012 .

[3]  C. Poon,et al.  USE OF RECYCLED AGGREGATES IN MOLDED CONCRETE BRICKS AND BLOCKS , 2002 .

[4]  F. López Gayarre,et al.  Manufacture of concrete kerbs and floor blocks with recycled aggregate from C&DW , 2013 .

[5]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[6]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: Current situations in Hong Kong , 2013 .

[7]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis , 2011 .

[8]  F Andreola,et al.  Glass-ceramics obtained by the recycling of end of life cathode ray tubes glasses. , 2005, Waste management.

[9]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[10]  S Marinković,et al.  Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. , 2010, Waste management.

[11]  A. Mladenovič,et al.  Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA. , 2015, Waste management.

[12]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Enhancing the performance of pre-cast concrete blocks by incorporating waste glass - : ASR consideration , 2007 .

[13]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  Life cycle carbon footprint measurement of Portland cement and ready mix concrete for a city with local scarcity of resources like Hong Kong , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives , 2009 .

[15]  Marios Soutsos,et al.  Use of recycled demolition aggregate in precast products, phase II: Concrete paving blocks , 2011 .

[16]  Jeannette Sjunnesson Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete , 2005 .

[17]  M Guo,et al.  LCA data quality: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Gilles Escadeillas,et al.  Use of metakaolin to stabilize sewage sludge ash and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash in cement-based materials. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  J. G. Sanjayan,et al.  Chapter 1 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Concrete Manufacture , 2017 .

[20]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[21]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Sensitivity analysis and improvement scenarios. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Mengjun Chen,et al.  Lead recovery and the feasibility of foam glass production from funnel glass of dismantled cathode ray tube through pyrovacuum process. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  A comparative study on the feasible use of recycled beverage and CRT funnel glass as fine aggregate in cement mortar , 2012 .

[24]  Teh Fu Yen,et al.  Encapsulation of lead from hazardous CRT glass wastes using biopolymer cross-linked concrete systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[25]  D. Fino,et al.  Eco-efficient waste glass recycling: Integrated waste management and green product development through LCA. , 2012, Waste management.

[26]  Jun Chen,et al.  Photocatalytic cementitious materials: influence of the microstructure of cement paste on photocatalytic pollution degradation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Effects of recycled fine glass aggregates on the properties of dry–mixed concrete blocks , 2013 .

[28]  C. Poon,et al.  Effects of contaminants on the properties of concrete paving blocks prepared with recycled concrete aggregates , 2007 .

[29]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete , 2010 .

[30]  P. Van den Heede,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations , 2012 .

[31]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[32]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Photocatalytic NO removal of concrete surface layers intermixed with TiO2 , 2013 .

[33]  Defne Apul,et al.  A life cycle based environmental impacts assessment of construction materials used in road construction , 2010 .

[34]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Environmental assessment of brick production in Greece , 2007 .

[35]  Russell W Stratton,et al.  Quantifying variability in life cycle greenhouse gas inventories of alternative middle distillate transportation fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  ヴァルデマー・ツァプリク,et al.  Production of iron oxide red pigment , 2015 .