Voting with their seats: computer laboratory design and the casual user

Student computer laboratories are provided by most teaching institutions around the world; however, what is the most effective layout for such facilities? The log-in data files from computer laboratories at a regional university in Australia were analysed to determine whether there was a pattern in student seating. In particular, it was investigated whether students and academic staff usage was affected by the layout of a computer laboratory and therefore a preference by students in where they were seated. It was found that the layout of the computer laboratories does not affect which computer layout a student will use. Further, it was found that academic staff prefer to use a computer laboratory designed along a more traditional lecture room layout when working with first-year students. This research will be valuable to institutions designing new computer laboratory facilities.

[1]  Sheryl E. Kimes,et al.  The Impact of Restaurant Table Characteristics on Meal Duration and Spending , 2004 .

[2]  Dirk H. R. Spennemann,et al.  Patterns of user behavior in University on-line forums , 2004 .

[3]  John Atkinson,et al.  Redirecting Under-Utilised Computer Laboratories into Cluster Computing Facilities. , 2005 .

[4]  Darhl M. Pedersen.  Personality and Classroom Seating , 1994 .

[5]  John Atkinson,et al.  One reality of the Digital Divide: An exploration of individual computer lab usage at a regional university in Australia , 2005 .

[6]  Diane Fishman,et al.  Seating and Area Preferences in a College Reserve Room , 1972 .

[7]  Dirk H. R. Spennemann,et al.  A longitudinal study of data management practices among parks management students , 2002 .

[8]  John Atkinson,et al.  Configuration and management of a cluster computing facility in undergraduate student computer laboratories , 2006 .

[9]  Susan M. Macey.  Managing a Computer Teaching Laboratory , 1998 .

[10]  David B. Bills,et al.  Social Science Computer Labs as Sites for Teaching and Learning: Challenges and Solutions in Their Design and Maintenance. , 2001 .

[11]  John Atkinson,et al.  A choice of terminals: spatial patterning in computer laboratories , 2007 .

[12]  Charles I. Brooks,et al.  College Classroom Ecology , 1991 .

[13]  Robert Sommer.  : Designing and Space Planning for Libraries: A Behavioral Guide , 1980 .

[14]  Dirk H. R. Spennemann,et al.  A longitudinal study of the uptake of and confidence in using e‐mail among parks management students , 2003 .

[15]  Gary R. Byrd,et al.  Classroom Seating , 1980 .

[16]  John Atkinson,et al.  Sessional, weekly and diurnal patterns of computer lab usage by students attending a regional University in Australia , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Dirk H. R. Spennemann.  Do techno‐skeptics use on‐campus e‐mail? , 1997 .

[18]  Angela Carbone,et al.  Students' reactions to a studio-based teaching and learning philosophy in the three year IT degree , 2002 .

[19]  Peter G. Taylor,et al.  Place and Space in the Design of New Learning Environments , 2000 .

[20]  Liz Smith,et al.  THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: AN URBAN MISS? , 2003 .

[21]  Tim Albertson,et al.  Rows, Isles or Peninsulas? An Analysis of Computer Laboratory Layouts in Schools. , 1998 .

[22]  Elaine Cohen,et al.  Designing and space planning for libraries , 1979 .

[23]  John H. Hoag,et al.  Seating Location in Large Lectures: Are Seating Preferences or Location Related to Course Performance? , 2004 .

[24]  Stephani K. A. Robson.  A Review of Psychological and Cultural Effects on Seating Behavior and Their Application to Foodservice Settings , 2002 .

[25]  Duncan Joiner.  Social Ritual and Architectural Space , 1970 .

[26]  Angela Carbone,et al.  Developing a Model of First Year Student Satisfaction in a Studio-based Teaching Environment , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[27]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  Manipulating Personal Salience: The Effects of Performance Expectations on Physical Positioning , 2000 .