Continuation of Pembrolizumab with Additional Chemotherapy after Progression with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study

Abstract Purpose: Although programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown survival benefits in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients progress. This study evaluated whether continuing pembrolizumab with additional chemotherapy after failure of prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor extends survival. Patients and Methods: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II study enrolled patients with NSCLC who received one or two cytotoxic chemotherapy, including at least one platinum-doublet regimen, and progressed on second- or third-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy as the last systemic therapy. Patients were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy, stratified by histology and clinical outcomes to prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 98 patients were randomized to the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (N = 47) and placebo-chemotherapy arm (N = 51). At the median follow-up duration of 10.5 months, there was no statistical difference in PFS [median 4.1 months vs. 5.9 months; HR = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69–1.62; P = 0.78) and overall survival (median 11.5 months vs. 12.0 months; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66–1.83; P = 0.73) between the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy arms. In a subgroup with PD-L1 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells and favorable clinical outcomes to prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (partial response or 6 months or longer of stable disease), the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy arm showed a higher 24-month survival rate than the placebo-chemotherapy arm (74% vs. 38%; HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.13–2.1; P = 0.34). Conclusions: This study did not show a survival benefit with the continuation of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in patients whose NSCLC progressed on second- or third-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. See related commentary by Tseng and Gainor, p. 2206

[1]  V. Sondak,et al.  Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab Following Anti-PD-1/L1 Failure in Melanoma , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Addeo,et al.  Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer harbouring driver mutations. , 2021, Cancer treatment reviews.

[3]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2021. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[4]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1-Selected Patients with NSCLC. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S. Reu,et al.  Response to Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Molecular Driver Alterations , 2020, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[6]  S. Novello,et al.  Updated Analysis From KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum for Previously Untreated Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  F. Bidault,et al.  Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[8]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a CSCO–ESMO initiative endorsed by JSMO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Sharyn I. Katz,et al.  Radiologic Pseudoprogression during Anti–PD‐1 Therapy for Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  A. Costantini,et al.  Increased Response Rates to Salvage Chemotherapy Administered after PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  T. Powles,et al.  Response Rate to Chemotherapy After Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. , 2018, European urology.

[12]  A. Ribas,et al.  Mechanisms of Resistance to PD-1 and PD-L1 Blockade , 2018, Cancer journal.

[13]  J. Soria,et al.  In the immuno-oncology era, is anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy modifying the sensitivity to conventional cancer therapies? , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[14]  C. Van Waes,et al.  Cisplatin Alters Antitumor Immunity and Synergizes with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2017, Cancer Immunology Research.

[15]  Carlos Barrios,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[16]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Burotto,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  L. Emens,et al.  The Interplay of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: Harnessing Potential Synergies , 2015, Cancer Immunology Research.

[20]  Haesook T. Kim Cumulative Incidence in Competing Risks Data and Competing Risks Regression Analysis , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.