From observing the relationship between volume and outcome to making policy recommendations: comments on Sheikh.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Mark,et al. Does quality influence choice of hospital? , 1990, JAMA.
[2] R. Brook,et al. Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.
[3] H. Luft,et al. Evaluating individual hospital quality through outcome statistics. , 1986, JAMA.
[4] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.
[5] A Milstein,et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.
[6] D. Cook,et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.
[7] A. Walker,et al. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials. , 2004, Journal of wound care.
[8] A. Enthoven,et al. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.
[9] D. Cook,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. , 1999, Health technology assessment.
[10] K. Johansen,et al. Invited commentary: Physician responses to purchaser quality initiatives for surgical procedures. , 2001, Surgery.