Finite-difference immersed boundary method consistent with wall conditions for incompressible turbulent flow simulations

An immersed boundary method to achieve the consistency with a desired wall velocity was developed. Existing schemes of immersed boundary methods for incompressible flow violate the wall condition in the discrete equation system during time-advancement. This problem arises from the inconsistency of the pressure with the velocity interpolated to represent the solid wall, which does not coincide with the computational grid. The numerical discrepancy does not become evident in the laminar flow simulation but in the turbulent flow simulation. To eliminate this inconsistency, a modified pressure equation based on the interpolated pressure gradient was derived for the spatial second-order discrete equation system. The conservation of the wall condition, mass, momentum and energy in the present method was theoretically demonstrated. To verify the theory, large eddy simulations for a plane channel, circular pipe and nuclear rod bundle were successfully performed. Both these theoretical and numerical validations improve the reliability and the applicability of the immersed boundary method.

[1]  R. Verzicco,et al.  Combined Immersed-Boundary Finite-Difference Methods for Three-Dimensional Complex Flow Simulations , 2000 .

[2]  Kensuke Yokoi Numerical method for a moving solid object in flows. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Takeo Kajishima,et al.  One-Equation Subgrid Scale Model Using Dynamic Procedure for the Energy Production , 2006 .

[4]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[5]  J. B. Perot,et al.  An analysis of the fractional step method , 1993 .

[6]  W. Shyy,et al.  Regular Article: An Accurate Cartesian Grid Method for Viscous Incompressible Flows with Complex Immersed Boundaries , 1999 .

[7]  Jerry Westerweel,et al.  Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Takeo Kajishima Conservation Properties of Finite Difference Method for Convection. , 1994 .

[9]  P. Moin,et al.  Fully Conservative Higher Order Finite Difference Schemes for Incompressible Flow , 1998 .

[10]  J. Dukowicz,et al.  Approximate factorization as a high order splitting for the implicit incompressible flow equations , 1992 .

[11]  J. Ferziger,et al.  A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry , 2002 .

[12]  P. Gresho Incompressible Fluid Dynamics: Some Fundamental Formulation Issues , 1991 .

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[14]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[15]  Jungwoo Kim,et al.  An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries , 2001 .

[16]  Takeo Kajishima,et al.  The Effect of Mixing-vane Arrangements in a Subchannel Turbulent Flow , 2006 .

[17]  Takeo Kajishima,et al.  Decay of Swirling Turbulent Flow in Rod-bundle , 2006 .