The bust of Francesco II Gonzaga: from digital documentation to 3D printing.

Abstract. Geomatics technics and methods are now able to provide a great contribution to the Cultural Heritage (CH) processes, being adaptable to different purposes: management, diagnosis, restoration, protection, study and research, communication, formation and fruition of the Cultural Heritage. This experimentation was done with an eye to encouraging and promoting the development of principles and good practices for recording, documentation and information management of cultural heritage. This research focuses on the documentation path of a cultural asset, in particular a Renaissance statue, aimed to achieve a three dimensional model useful for many digital applications and for solid reproduction. The digital copy can be used in many contexts and represents an efficient tool to preserve and promote CH. It can be included in virtual museum archives and catalogues, shared on network with cultural operators and users, and it permits the contextualization of the asset in its artistic and historical background. Moreover, the possibility to obtain a hard copy, reproduced through 3D printing, allows to reach new opportunities of interaction with CH. In this article, two techniques for the digitization of the terracotta bust of Francesco II Gonzaga, in the City Museum of Mantua, are described: the triangulation scanner and dense image matching photogrammetry. As well as the description of the acquisition and the elaborations, other aspects are taken into account: the characteristics of the object, the place for the acquisition, the ultimate goal and the economic availability. There are also highlighted the optimization pipeline to get the correct three-dimensional models and a 3D printed copy. A separate section discusses the comparison of the realized model to identify the positive and negative aspects of each adopted application.

[1]  Rodolfo Signorini,et al.  A casa di Andrea Mantegna : cultura artistica a Mantova nel Quattrocento , 2006 .

[2]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  State of the art in high density image matching , 2014 .

[3]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Acquisizione 3D e modellazione poligonale , 2010 .

[4]  Paolo Piumatti,et al.  Digital photogrammetry: a standard approach to cultural heritage survey , 2003 .

[5]  M. Rothermel,et al.  SURE : PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION FROM IMAGER Y , 2013 .

[6]  Caterina Balletti,et al.  TOOTEKO: A CASE STUDY OF AUGMENTED REALITY FOR AN ACCESSIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE. DIGITIZATION, 3D PRINTING AND SENSORS FOR AN AUDIO-TACTILE EXPERIENCE , 2015 .

[7]  Andrea Adami,et al.  Dal rilievo alla maquette: il caso di San Michele in Isola , 2012 .

[8]  Eva Pietroni,et al.  Digital Techniques for Etruscan Graves: the Etruscanning Project , 2012, VAST.

[9]  Luigi Fregonese,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN LASER SCANNING AND AUTOMATED 3D MODELLING TECHNIQUES TO RECONSTRUCT COMPLEX AND EXTENSIVE CULTURAL HERITAGE AREAS , 2013 .

[10]  J.-Angelo Beraldin,et al.  INTEGRATION OF LASER SCANNING AND CLOSE-RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY – THE LAST DECADE AND BEYOND , 2004 .

[11]  Fregonese Luigi,et al.  Transmission of cultural heritage through time and space by digital 3D models , 2011 .

[12]  Hartmut Bossel,et al.  Modeling and simulation , 1994 .

[13]  Andreas Reichinger,et al.  3D Printing for Cultural Heritage: Preservation, Accessibility, Research and Education , 2014, 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage.