Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems.

BACKGROUND Inertial Magnetic Measurement Systems (IMMS) are becoming increasingly popular by allowing for measurements outside the motion laboratory. The latest models enable long term, accurate measurement of segment motion in terms of joint angles, if initial segment orientations can accurately be determined. The standard procedure for definition of segmental orientation is based on the measurement of positions of bony landmarks (BLM). However, IMMS do not deliver position information, so an alternative method to establish IMMS based, anatomically understandable segment orientations is proposed. METHODS For five subjects, IMMS recordings were collected in a standard anatomical position for definition of static axes, and during a series of standardized motions for the estimation of kinematic axes of rotation. For all axes, the intra- and inter-individual dispersion was estimated. Subsequently, local coordinate systems (LCS) were constructed on the basis of the combination of IMMS axes with the lowest dispersion and compared with BLM based LCS. FINDINGS The repeatability of the method appeared to be high; for every segment at least two axes could be determined with a dispersion of at most 3.8 degrees. Comparison of IMMS based with BLM based LCS yielded compatible results for the thorax, but less compatible results for the humerus, forearm and hand, where differences in orientation rose to 17.2 degrees. INTERPRETATION Although different from the 'gold standard' BLM based LCS, IMMS based LCS can be constructed repeatable, enabling the estimation of segment orientations outside the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS A procedure for the definition of local reference frames using IMMS is proposed.

[1]  A R Karduna,et al.  Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Laura Rocchi,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Recording scapular motion using an acromion marker cluster. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[4]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  J. D. de Groot,et al.  A three-dimensional regression model of the shoulder rhythm. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  G R Johnson,et al.  A framework for the definition of standardized protocols for measuring upper-extremity kinematics. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism. , 1994 .

[8]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Magnetic distortion in motion labs, implications for validating inertial magnetic sensors. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[9]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  A method for in-vivo kinematic analysis of the forearm. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  P. Veltink,et al.  Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Variation in the position and orientation of the elbow flexion axis. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Arm position during daily activity. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[13]  P H Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of arm orientation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  In vivo validation of a new technique that compensates for soft tissue artefact in the upper-arm: preliminary results. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[16]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  O039 Use of ambulatory accelerometry to assess the sit-to-stand movement , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew A. Brodie,et al.  FUSION MOTION CAPTURE: CAN TECHNOLOGY BE USED TO OPTIMISE ALPINE SKI RACING TECHNIQUE? , 2007 .

[19]  H E Veeger,et al.  Determining the optimal flexion-extension axis of the elbow in vivo - a study of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.