Mechanical interaction between spherical inhomogeneities: an assessment of a method based on the equivalent inclusion

This paper assesses the ability of the Equivalent Inclusion Method (EIM) with third order truncated Taylor series (Moschovidis and Mura, 1975) to describe the stress distributions of interacting inhomogeneities. The cases considered are two identical spherical voids and glass or rubber inhomogeneities in an infinite elastic matrix. Results are compared with those obtained using spherical dipolar coordinates, which are assumed to be exact, and by a Finite Element Analysis. The EIM gives better results for voids than for inhomogeneities stiffer than the matrix. In the case of rubber inhomogeneities, while the EIM gives accurate values of the hydrostatic pressure inside the rubber, the stress concentrations are inaccurate at very small neighbouring distances for all stiffnesses. A parameter based on the residual stress discontinuity at the interface is proposed to evaluate the quality of the solution given by the EIM. Finally, for inhomogeneities stiffer than the matrix, the method is found to diverge for expansions in Taylor series truncated at the third order.

[1]  J. D. Eshelby The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  The load transfer between two rigid spherical inclusions in an elastic medium , 1994 .

[3]  J. Hilborn,et al.  Influence of voids on the stress distribution and deformation behaviour of epoxies under uniaxial deformation , 1998 .

[4]  Hervé Moulinec,et al.  A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure , 1998, ArXiv.

[5]  Andreas Acrivos,et al.  The solution of the equations of linear elasticity for an infinite region containing two spherical inclusions , 1978 .

[6]  Toshio Mura,et al.  Two-Ellipsoidal Inhomogeneities by the Equivalent Inclusion Method , 1975 .

[7]  Toshio Mura,et al.  The Elastic Field Outside an Ellipsoidal Inclusion , 1977 .

[8]  C. Fond,et al.  Volume change and light scattering during mechanical damage in polymethylmethacrylate toughened with core-shell rubber particles , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[9]  M. Cherkaoui,et al.  Elastic composites with coated reinforcements: A micromechanical approach for nonhomothetic topology , 1995 .

[10]  M. Berveiller,et al.  The inhomogeneous and plastic inclusion problem with moving boundary , 1991 .

[11]  Toshio Mura,et al.  Micromechanics of defects in solids , 1982 .

[12]  Gregory J. Rodin,et al.  On the problem of linear elasticity for an infinite region containing a finite number of non-intersecting spherical inhomogeneities , 1991 .

[13]  C. Fond,et al.  Polymers toughened with rubber microspheres: an analytical solution for stresses and strains in the rubber particles at equilibrium and rupture , 1996 .