Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California

Much policy attention has been given to promote fledgling energy technologies that promise to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. These policies often aim to correct market failures, such as environmental externalities and learning¥by-doing (LBD). We examine the implications of the assumption that LBD exists, quantifying the market failure due to LBD. We develop a model of technological advancement based on LBD and environmental market failures to examine the economically efficient level of subsidies in CaliforniaOs solar photovoltaic market. Under central-case parameter estimates, including nonappropriable LBD, we find that maximizing net social benefits implies a solar subsidy schedule similar in magnitude to the recently implemented California Solar Initiative. This result holds for a wide range of LBD parameters. However, with no LBD, the subsidies cannot be justified by the environmental externality alone.

[1]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Effects of Technological Change, Experience, and Environmental Regulation on the Construction Cost of Coal-Burning Generating Units , 1985 .

[2]  Wolfgang Palz,et al.  ENERGY PAY-BACK TIME OF PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES , 1991 .

[3]  L. Goulder,et al.  Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Achieving low-cost emissions targets , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Kazuhiko Kato,et al.  Energy pay‐back time and life‐cycle CO2 emission of residential PV power system with silicon PV module , 1998 .

[6]  Erik Alsema,et al.  Energy requirements and CO2 mitigation potential of PV systems , 1998 .

[7]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[8]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Accelerating residential PV expansion: supply analysis for competitive electricity markets , 2001 .

[9]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[10]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Clean energy technology buydowns : economic theory, analytic tools, and the photovoltaics case , 2002 .

[11]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey , 2002 .

[12]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  The learning potential of photovoltaics: implications for energy policy , 2004 .

[13]  B. V. D. Zwaana,et al.  The learning potential of photovoltaics : implications for energy policy , 2004 .

[14]  Severin Borenstein,et al.  Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells , 2005 .

[15]  R. Williams,et al.  Accelerating residential PV expansion: demand analysis for competitive electricity markets , 2005 .

[16]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[17]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics , 2006 .

[18]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[19]  K. Gillingham,et al.  ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES: A Retrospective Examination , 2006 .

[20]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Electricity Generation Technologies , 2007 .