Long‐term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Robotic pancreatectomy is gaining momentum; however, limited data exist on the long‐term survival of this approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The objective of this study is to compare the long‐term oncologic outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) to open surgery in patients with PDAC.

[1]  J. U. Chong,et al.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma , 2022, HPB.

[2]  Jonathan C. King,et al.  Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Pancreatic Resections Are Not Inferior to Open Surgery , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[3]  H. Zeh,et al.  Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis , 2019, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[4]  J. Xiong,et al.  The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Michael Gerhards,et al.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[6]  U. Boggi,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[7]  B. Müller-Stich,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. , 2020, Annals of surgery.

[8]  B. Edwin,et al.  Long term oncological outcome of laparoscopic techniques in pancreatic cancer , 2018, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[9]  H. Zeh,et al.  Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy. , 2018, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[10]  V. Gebski,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  T. Keck,et al.  Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique – A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases , 2018, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[12]  Y. Fong,et al.  Propensity score‐matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  H. Zeh,et al.  A Combination of Robotic Approach and ERAS Pathway t for Pancreatoduodenectomy Optimizes Outcomes and Cos , 2019 .

[14]  M. Choti,et al.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[15]  H. Zeh,et al.  Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at an experienced institution is not associated with an increased risk of post-pancreatic hemorrhage. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[16]  M. Choti,et al.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  Song-Cheol Kim,et al.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Long‐term oncologic outcomes after standard resection , 2017, Surgery.

[18]  M. Choti,et al.  Conversion of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Predictors and Outcomes , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  M. Choti,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis , 2017, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[20]  M. Talamonti,et al.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Provides Oncologic Outcomes and Overall Survival Identical to Open Distal Pancreatectomy , 2017, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[21]  H. Zeh,et al.  A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[22]  S. Roman,et al.  Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[23]  B. Gayet,et al.  Comparable long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[24]  H. Zeh,et al.  Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[25]  G. Wakabayashi,et al.  Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[26]  S. Chalikonda,et al.  A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[27]  B. Edwin,et al.  Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer. , 2016, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[28]  O. Farges,et al.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Time for a Randomized Controlled Trial? Results of an All-inclusive National Observational Study. , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[29]  A. Ejaz,et al.  Perioperative Blood Transfusion and the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  S. Roman,et al.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[31]  Amer H Zureikat,et al.  Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[32]  A. Moser,et al.  250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Safety and Feasibility , 2013, Annals of surgery.