An improved upper-bound pushover procedure for seismic assessment of high-rise moment resisting steel frames

In recent years, nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) have gained considerable popularity as an efficient tool in the performance based seismic design practice. This was backed by extensive corroboration studies that have demonstrated its good accuracy in estimating the seismic response of regular structures. Despite the numerous improvements of the original versions of NSPs, their use to assess the seismic response of irregular structures and high-rise buildings is still challenging; they are not able to predict with sufficient accuracy all the complexities associated to the seismic response of this type of structures. Thus, an improved upper-bound (IUB) pushover procedure for seismic assessment of plane frames is presented in this paper, aiming to enhance the accuracy of existing methods in predicting the seismic behaviour of high-rise buildings. The novelty of this proposal is based on the adjustment of the pattern of the lateral load of the upper-bound pushover method applied to tall structures. The accuracy of the procedure is tested using nine, twelve, fifteen and twenty storeys steel buildings. The results of the (IUB) are compared to those of the capacity spectrum method, the modal pushover analysis, the upper bound pushover analysis, the modified upper bound pushover analysis and the non-linear time history analysis (NTHA). In most cases, the proposed procedure shows better results and closer to those obtained by NTHA.

[1]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  The extended consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of two-way unsymmetric-plan tall buildings under influence of two horizontal components of ground motions , 2014 .

[2]  J. Peters,et al.  Uniform Building Code , 2014 .

[3]  A. Pintea,et al.  Seismic Evaluation of Multi-Storey Moment-Resisting Steel Frames With Stiffness Irregularities Using Standard and Advanced Pushover Methods , 2012 .

[4]  Mehdi Poursha,et al.  The modified and extended upper-bound (UB) pushover method for the multi-mode pushover analysis of unsymmetric-plan tall buildings , 2015 .

[5]  R. Abbasnia,et al.  An alternative modal combination rule for adaptive pushover analysis , 2016 .

[6]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PUSHOVER-BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[7]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings , 2004 .

[8]  Rui Pinho,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF A DISPLACEMENT-BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER PROCEDURE , 2004 .

[9]  A. Davoudi,et al.  An adaptive pushover procedure based on effective modal mass combination rule , 2013 .

[10]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation , 2011 .

[11]  Ashutosh Bagchi,et al.  Seismic performance of a 20‐story steel‐frame building in Canada , 2010 .

[12]  Rui Pinho,et al.  ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF ADAPTIVE AND NON-ADAPTIVE FORCE-BASED PUSHOVER PROCEDURES , 2004 .

[13]  Carlos Bhatt,et al.  The Extended Adaptive Capacity Spectrum Method for the Seismic Assessment of Plan-Asymmetric Buildings , 2014 .

[14]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Spectra-Based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures , 2000 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[16]  Toshimi Kabeyasawa,et al.  A story shear-based adaptive pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of buildings , 2010 .

[17]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings , 2009 .

[18]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[19]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[20]  S. F. Ghahari,et al.  Studying higher mode effects on the performance of nonlinear static analysis methods considering near-fault effects , 2013 .

[21]  Ming Wei Liu,et al.  An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings , 2004 .

[22]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[23]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Further development of a multimodal pushover analysis procedure for seismic assessment of bridges , 2009 .

[24]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building , 2010 .

[25]  Rita Bento,et al.  Improved Modal Pushover Analysis in seismic assessment of asymmetric plan buildings under the influence of one and two horizontal components of ground motions , 2016 .

[26]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Three‐dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings , 2011 .