Impact of Knowledge Acquisition on Technology Assimilation

The knowledge-based view of the firm has motivated a rich stream of research on how social factors impact knowledge acquisition by firms. More recently, information systems research has seen an increasing interest in the effect of social influences on software assimilation. This paper combines these two streams to examine the impact of social influences on software assimilation within the firm, using knowledge acquisition as a mediating variable. A structural equation model using formative constructs is developed. In this study of small and medium firms, we investigate the assimilation of three different software systems that support manufacturing. The study finds that the research model is statistically significant and provides evidence that social influences from a firm's peers, vendors, and suppliers promote knowledge acquisition and software assimilation. The study recommends a proactive role on the part of technology and enterprise intermediaries to design SME-appropriate solutions to promote software assimilation.

[1]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Richard V. McCarthy,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management Systems' Success , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[3]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[4]  Scott E. Knudson,et al.  Business-to-business payments and the role of financial electronic data interchange , 1994 .

[5]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology , 1974, Science.

[6]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[7]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How to build collaborative advantage , 2004 .

[8]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Information technology: Threats and opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises , 1993 .

[9]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  E. Rogers,et al.  The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: the adoption of telecommunications services by German banks , 1999 .

[11]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Reconceptualizing Innovation Compatibility as Organizational Alignment in Secondary IT Adoption Contexts: An Investigation of Software Reuse Infusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Organizational Innovation , 2001, MIS Q..

[14]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .

[15]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[16]  Cs Yap,et al.  Information systems success factors in small business , 1992 .

[17]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  M. Ebers The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks , 1997 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[20]  Michael J. Peel,et al.  A Study of Computer Usage and Strategic Planning in the SME Sector , 1999 .

[21]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Friends in High Places: The Effects of Social Networks on Discrimination in Salary Negotiations , 2000 .

[22]  P. Yetton,et al.  The Dynamics of SME Information Systems , 2002 .

[23]  Eric K. Clemons MAC-Philadelphia National Bank's strategic venture in shared ATM networks , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track.

[24]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[25]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[27]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[28]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Sharon Reeves,et al.  Predictors of MS/OR Application in Small Businesses , 1990 .

[30]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[31]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Jonathan H. Turner,et al.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action.Ronald S. Burt , 1985 .

[34]  Matthew S. Kraatz Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[35]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Engagement of External Expertise in Information Systems Implementation , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[37]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations , 1998 .

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[39]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[40]  Sanjeev Dewan,et al.  Firm Characteristics and Investments in Information Technology: Scale and Scope Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  G. D. Ottati Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district , 1994 .

[42]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[43]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[44]  William H. DeLone Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business , 1988, MIS Q..

[45]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Direct and Indirect Use of Information Systems in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation of System Usage in a Public Hospital , 2008, ICIS.

[46]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[47]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[49]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[50]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[51]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[52]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[53]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[54]  Anna Dubois,et al.  Relationships as Activity Links , 1993 .

[55]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..

[56]  Nigel J. Lockett,et al.  Title: the Potential of Critical E-applications for Engaging Smes in E Business: a Provider Perspective the Potential of Critical E-applications for Engaging Smes in E-business: a Provider Perspective , 2022 .

[57]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  MAC - Philadelphia National Bank's Strategic Venture in Shared ATM Networks , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  T. Beck,et al.  Financial and Legal Constraints to Growth: Does Firm Size Matter? , 2005 .

[59]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Adi Prananto,et al.  Spectrum of e-business maturity in australian SMEs: a multiple case studies approach on the applicability of the stages of growth for e-business model , 2003, ECIS.

[61]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[62]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Business agility and diffusion of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[64]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[65]  Songpol Kulviwat,et al.  The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption , 2009 .

[66]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[67]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[68]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .

[69]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[70]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[71]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[72]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[73]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .