Beyond Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence: Personal and Vicarious Experiences, Impulsivity, and Offending Behavior

Recently, Stafford and Warr identified four categories of experiences hypothesized to underlie judgments about the risk of legal sanctions: personal punishment experience, personal punishment avoidance, vicarious punishment experience, and vicarious punishment avoidance. Using original data to test the Stafford and Warr model, five key findings emerge. First, both personal and vicarious avoidance experiences relate positively to offending. Second, punishment and avoidance experiences affect behavior by influencing sanction risk perceptions. Third, the combination of low personal and vicarious punishment avoidance strongly dissuades offending. Fourth, prior offending conditions the influence of punishment and avoidance experiences in a manner consistent with Stafford and Warr. Fifth, while impulsive individuals are influenced primarily by their own experiences, individuals who are not as impulsive tend to attend more to the experiences of others. Finally, punishment experiences appear to encourage rather than discourage future offending. We discuss how the self-serving bias and the gambler's fallacy help explain this latter, anomalous result.

[1]  T. Moffitt.  Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[2]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  LINKING ACTUAL AND PERCEIVED CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT , 1979 .

[3]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[4]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Gender and Perceived Chances of Arrest , 1981 .

[5]  M. Wolfgang,et al.  Delinquency in a birth cohort , 1972 .

[6]  Brenda Sims Blackwell,et al.  Changes in the sex patterning of perceived threats of sanctions , 1993 .

[7]  E. Barratt,et al.  Anxiety and Impulsiveness Related to Psychomotor Efficiency , 1959 .

[8]  Raymond C. Baumhart.  An Honest Profit: What Businessmen Say About Ethics in Business. , 1968 .

[9]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  An Application of Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence to Drinking and Driving , 1998 .

[10]  A. Gillis,et al.  Clarifying and Extending Power-Control Theory , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Deterrent and Experiential Effects: the Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research , 1982 .

[12]  A. Gillis,et al.  The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward a Power-Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  A review of predictors of youth violence. , 1998 .

[14]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  INTEGRATING CELERITY, IMPULSIVITY, AND EXTRALEGAL SANCTION THREATS INTO A MODEL OF GENERAL DETERRENCE: THEORY AND EVIDENCE* , 2001 .

[15]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Impulsivity in adults: Motor inhibition and time-interval estimation. , 1985 .

[16]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Sanctions and Deviance: Evidence and Remaining Questions , 1973 .

[17]  Robert F. Meier,et al.  Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity , 1977 .

[18]  R. Homel.  Policing and punishing the drinking driver , 1988 .

[19]  Mary Owen Cameron.  The booster and the snitch : department store shoplifting , 1964 .

[20]  Richard Lempert.  Organizing for Deterrence: Lessons from a Study of Child Support , 1981 .

[21]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  LOW SELF‐CONTROL, SOCIAL BONDS, AND CRIME: SOCIAL CAUSATION, SOCIAL SELECTION, OR BOTH?* , 1999 .

[22]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  RECONSIDERING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SES AND DELINQUENCY: CAUSATION BUT NOT CORRELATION* , 1999 .

[23]  R. Homel.  Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver: A Study of General and Specific Deterrence , 1989 .

[24]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  ASSESSMENTS OF RISK AND BEHAVIORAL EXPERIENCE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF CHANGE , 1985 .

[25]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .

[26]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning. , 1977 .

[27]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Reconceptualizing Deterrence: An Empirical Test of Personal and Vicarious Experiences , 1995 .

[28]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence , 1980 .

[29]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note. , 1993 .

[30]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[31]  Donald R. Lynam,et al.  IS AGE IMPORTANT? TESTING A GENERAL VERSUS A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR* , 1997 .

[32]  J. Gibbs.  Crime, punishment, and deterrence , 1975 .

[33]  Linda Babcock,et al.  Damage Caps, Motivated Anchoring, and Bargaining Impasse , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[34]  F. Zimring,et al.  Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control , 1973 .

[35]  Mark Warr,et al.  A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence , 1993 .

[36]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Estimating Perceptual Stability and Deterrent Effects: The Role of Perceived Legal Punishment in the Inhibition of Criminal Involvement , 1983 .

[37]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[38]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders' decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending , 1996 .

[39]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction , 1993 .

[40]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Gender roles and social control , 1985 .

[41]  R. A. Yackulic,et al.  The Psychology of the "Gamblers's Fallacy" in Probabilistic Reasoning. , 1984 .

[42]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  DOES SELF‐CONTROL AFFECT SURVEY RESPONSE? APPLYING EXPLORATORY, CONFIRMATORY, AND ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ANALYSIS TO GRASMICK ET AL.'S SELF‐CONTROL SCALE , 2000 .

[43]  K. Cross.  Not can, but will college teaching be improved? , 1977 .

[44]  J. Arnett.  Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective , 1992 .

[45]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF PERCEIVED CERTAINTY AND SEVERITY OF PUNISHMENT REVISITED , 1989 .

[46]  Norval Morris,et al.  Punishment and Deterrence , 1974 .

[47]  Susan L. Miller,et al.  Determinants of perceived risk of formal sanction for courtship violence , 1994 .

[48]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF PAST TO FUTURE PARTICIPATION IN DELINQUENCY , 1991 .

[49]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Crime and Justice.

[50]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  In Defense of Self-Control , 2000 .

[51]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[52]  R. Paternoster,et al.  Sanction threats and appeals to morality : Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime , 1996 .

[53]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME‐PRONE? REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS* , 1994 .

[54]  G. Geis,et al.  Criminology: Explaining Crime and Its Context , 1991 .

[55]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[56]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Studying deterrence with active residential burglars , 1999 .

[57]  D. Nagin,et al.  Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime , 1993 .