Decision Support in Collision Situations at Sea

The known navigational systems in use perform information functions and as such are helpful in the process of safe conduct of a vessel. One of the ways to assist in reducing the number of marine accidents is the development of systems which perform decision support functions, i.e. automatically generate solutions to collision situations. The use of information (and communication) technologies including knowledge engineering allows the generation of proposals for anti-collision manoeuvres taking into account the COLREGs. Demand for further enhancement of navigational safety by limiting human errors has initiated a trend to convert navigational information systems into decision support systems. The implementation of decision support systems will potentially reduce the number of human errors, which translates into a reduction of accidents at sea and their adverse consequences. This paper presents a summary of the research to date on the navigational decision support system NAVDEC. The system has been positively verified in laboratory conditions and in field tests – on a motor ferry and a sailing ship. Challenges associated with the development and implementation of such systems are outlined.

[1]  W. Kazimierski,et al.  Determining manoeuvre detection threshold of GRNN filter in the process of tracking in marine navigational radars , 2008, 2008 International Radar Symposium.

[2]  Piotr Wołejsza Navigation Decision Supporting System (NAVDEC) — Testing In Real Condition , 2014 .

[3]  Piotr Borkowski,et al.  Marine Integrated Navigational Decision Support System , 2012, TST.

[4]  Ming-Cheng Tsou,et al.  THE STUDY OF SHIP COLLISION AVOIDANCE ROUTE PLANNING BY ANT COLONY ALGORITHM , 2010 .

[5]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Ship Manoeuvring in Restricted Areas: An Attempt to Quantify Dangerous Situations Using a Probabilistic-Fuzzy Method , 2006 .

[6]  Toke Koldborg Jensen,et al.  Empirical Ship Domain based on AIS Data , 2013, Journal of Navigation.

[7]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  Functional Adaptive Control , 2001 .

[8]  Piotr Borkowski,et al.  Ship Course-Keeping Algorithm Based On Knowledge Base , 2011, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[9]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Schema of Inference Processes in a Preliminary Identification of Navigational Situation in Maritime Transport , 2014, TST.

[10]  Yueying Wang,et al.  An Empirically-Calibrated Ship Domain as a Safety Criterion for Navigation in Confined Waters , 2015, Journal of Navigation.

[11]  Dimitrios X. Kokotos,et al.  An application of data mining tools for the study of shipping safety in restricted waters , 2011 .

[12]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Information Exchange Automation in Maritime Transport , 2014 .

[13]  R. Szlapczynski Evolutionary Sets Of Safe Ship Trajectories: A New Approach To Collision Avoidance , 2010, Journal of Navigation.

[14]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Safe Ship Trajectory Determination in the ENC Environment , 2014, TST.

[15]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Communication Automation in Maritime Transport , 2013 .

[16]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Fuzzy Logic in the Navigational Decision Support Process Onboard a Sea-Going Vessel , 2010, ICAISC.

[17]  Adam Weintrit,et al.  The Electronic Chart Display and Information System (Ecdis): An Operational Handbook , 2009 .

[18]  Ning Wang,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Based Vessel Collision Avoidance Strategy Optimization , 2014 .

[19]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  Functional Adaptive Control: An Intelligent Systems Approach , 2012 .

[20]  Piotr Borkowski,et al.  Ship course stabilization by feedback linearization with adaptive object model , 2013 .

[21]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Modeling of ship trajectory in collision situations by an evolutionary algorithm , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[22]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Model of Inference Processes in the Automatic Maritime Communication System , 2013, TST.

[23]  C. Su,et al.  Decision Support from Genetic Algorithms for Ship Collision Avoidance Route Planning and Alerts , 2010 .

[24]  Janusz Magaj,et al.  NAVIGATION DECISION SUPPORTING SYSTEM (NAVDEC) — TESTING ON FULL MISSION SIMULATOR , 2013 .

[25]  Piotr Kolendo,et al.  Distributed Evolutionary Algorithm for Path Planning in Navigation Situation , 2013 .

[26]  Ernestos Tzannatos,et al.  Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre- and post-ISM period , 2009 .

[27]  Cheng-Neng Hwang,et al.  The Integrated Design of Fuzzy Collision-Avoidance and H∞-Autopilots on Ships , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[28]  Józef Lisowski,et al.  Sensitivity of computer support game algorithms of safe ship control , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[29]  P Woejsza Functionality of Navigation Decision Supporting System – NAVDEC , 2013 .

[30]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  The Ship Domain : A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area , 2009 .

[31]  Joanna Szlapczynska Multicriteria Evolutionary Weather Routing Algorithm in Practice , 2013 .

[32]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Maritime Intelligent Transport Systems , 2010, TST.