Experimental results of transient testing at the amine plant at Technology Centre Mongstad: Open-loop responses and performance of decentralized control structures for load changes

Flexible operation of combined cycle thermal power plants with chemical absorption post combustion CO2 capture is a key aspect for the development of the technology. Several studies have assessed the performance of decentralized control structures applied to the post combustion CO2 capture process via dynamic process simulation, however there is a lack of published data from demonstration or pilot plants. In this work, experiments on transient testing were conducted at the amine plant at Technology Centre Mongstad, for flue gas from a combined cycle combined heat and power plant (3.7–4.1 CO2 vol%). The experiments include six tests on open-loop responses and eight tests on transient performance of decentralized control structures for fast power plant load change scenarios. The transient response of key process variables to changes in flue gas volumetric flow rate, solvent flow rate and reboiler duty were analyzed. In general the process stabilizes within 1 h for 20% step changes in process inputs, being the absorber column absorption rates the slowest process variable to stabilize to changes in reboiler duty and solvent flow rate. Tests on fast load changes (10%/min) in flue gas flow rate representing realistic load changes in an upstream power plant showed that decentralized control structures could be employed in order to bring the process to desired off-design steady-state operating conditions within (<60 min). However, oscillations and instabilities in absorption and desorption rates driven by interactions of the capture rate and stripper temperature feedback control loops can occur when the rich solvent flow rate is changed significantly and fast as a control action to reject the flue gas volumetric flow rate disturbance and keeping liquid to gas ratio or capture rate constant.

[1]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Demonstrating load-change transient performance of a commercial-scale natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture , 2017 .

[2]  Mai Bui,et al.  Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants - A review , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[3]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Regulatory Control of Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture from Power Plants , 2016 .

[4]  R. Kehlhofer,et al.  Combined-cycle gas and steam turbine power plants. 2. edition , 1991 .

[5]  Nina Enaasen Flø,et al.  Results from 30 wt% MEA Performance Testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad , 2017 .

[6]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[7]  Kihyung Kim,et al.  Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Dynamic Simulation: A Physics Based Simple Approach , 2013 .

[8]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a CO2 Post-Combustion Absorption Unit , 2012 .

[9]  Oddvar Gorset,et al.  Results from MEA testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad. Part II: Verification of baseline results , 2014 .

[10]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou.  Climate Change 2014 - Synthesis Report , 2015 .

[11]  Mai Bui,et al.  Flexible operation of CSIRO's post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant at the AGL Loy Yang power station , 2016 .

[12]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Economically efficient operation of CO2 capturing process. Part II. Design of control layer , 2012 .

[13]  Nina Enaasen Flø,et al.  Dynamic Process Model Validation and Control of the Amine Plant at CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad , 2017 .

[14]  Kamel Bennaceur,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option , 2008 .

[15]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Effects of CO2-Absorption Control Strategies on the Dynamic Performance of a Supercritical Pulverized-Coal-Fired Power Plant , 2017 .

[16]  Ilja Ausner,et al.  A pilot-scale study of dynamic response scenarios for the flexible operation of post-combustion CO2 capture , 2016 .

[17]  J. Minx,et al.  Climate Change 2014 : Synthesis Report , 2014 .

[18]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Dynamic model validation of the post-combustion CO2 absorption process , 2015 .

[19]  John Bagterp Jørgensen,et al.  Dynamic Operation and Simulation of Post-Combustion CO2 Capture , 2016 .

[20]  Angela Mangiaracina,et al.  Validation of a Dynamic Model of the Brindisi Pilot Plant , 2014 .

[21]  Gerhard Schmitz,et al.  Dynamics of Postcombustion CO2 Capture Plants: Modeling, Validation, and Case Study , 2017, Industrial & engineering chemistry research.

[22]  Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Salazar,et al.  Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas- and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables , 2018 .

[23]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Carbon capture and storage update , 2014 .

[24]  Zhiwu Liang,et al.  Analysis of CO2 solubility and absorption heat into 1-dimethylamino-2-propanol solution , 2017 .

[25]  Zhiwu Liang,et al.  Reduction of energy requirement of CO2 desorption from a rich CO2-loaded MEA solution by using solid acid catalysts , 2017 .

[26]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Economically efficient operation of CO2 capturing process part I: Self-optimizing procedure for selecting the best controlled variables , 2011 .

[27]  Debangsu Bhattacharyya,et al.  Dynamic Data Reconciliation and Model Validation of a MEA-Based CO2 Capture System using Pilot Plant Data , 2016 .

[28]  Ajay Singh,et al.  Shell Cansolv CO2 capture technology: Achievement from First Commercial Plant☆ , 2014 .

[29]  Philip M. Besuner,et al.  Impacts of Wind and Solar on Fossil-Fueled Generators: Preprint , 2012 .

[30]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Selection and design of post-combustion CO2 capture process for 600 MW natural gas fueled thermal power plant based on operability , 2017 .

[31]  Rahul Anantharaman,et al.  Design-point and part-load considerations for natural gas combined cycle plants with post combustion capture , 2012 .

[32]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Dynamic Process Model Development and Validation with Transient Plant Data Collected from an MEA Test Campaign at the CO2 Technology Center Mongstad , 2017 .

[33]  Fatemeh Rezazadeh,et al.  Performance viability of a natural gas fired combined cycle power plant integrated with post-combustion CO2 capture at part-load and temporary non-capture operations , 2015 .

[34]  H. Spliethoff,et al.  A parametric approach for the valuation of power plant flexibility options , 2016 .

[35]  David Thimsen,et al.  Results from MEA Testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad: Verification of Baseline Results in 2015 , 2017 .

[36]  Olav Falk-Pedersen,et al.  Results from MEA testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad. Part I: Post-Combustion CO2 capture testing methodology , 2014 .

[37]  Debangsu Bhattacharyya,et al.  Development of Model and Model-Predictive Control of an MEA-Based Postcombustion CO2 Capture Process , 2016 .

[38]  J. Koch,et al.  How to determine a unit ramp rate (MW/MIN) for lowest total production cost , 1996 .

[39]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Identifying Operational Requirements for Flexible CCS Power Plant in Future Energy Systems , 2016 .

[40]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Consistent Inventory Control , 2009 .

[41]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Dynamic modelling and control of MEA absorption processes for CO2 capture from power plants , 2014 .

[42]  Gerhard Schmitz,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of Coal-Fired Power Plants with Postcombustion CO2 Capture , 2016 .

[43]  Richard Faber,et al.  Open-loop step responses for the MEA post-combustion capture process: Experimental results from the Esbjerg pilot plant , 2011 .

[44]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  The SIMC Method for Smooth PID Controller Tuning , 2012 .