FIRST CYCLE OF PISA (2000–2006)—INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES: RESEARCH AND POLICY DIRECTIONS

ABSTRACTThis special edition of IJMSE focuses on the Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) project now that it has completed a full cycle of administration—reading, mathematics, and science—to look at ways in which PISA has been used in participating countries and with what consequences, and to identify potential research and policy directions emanating from this initiative. Articles were invited to (a) reflect international perspectives on the uses and consequences of PISA to date and (b) speculate on future directions for research, curriculum, and policy using the PISA datasets. The introductory article provides a brief overview of common aspects of PISA: Evolving definitions of reading literacy, mathematics literacy, and science literacy; technical design of the instruments and data analysis procedures; the changing emphasis of administrations; and recent research using the datasets. PISA, unlike other international assessments in reading, mathematics, and science, has provided a fresh perspective on ‘what might be’ by decoupling the assessment from mandated curricula to focus on literacies needed for a 21st century economy. This unique feature of PISA brings with it possibilities and cautions for policy makers.

[1]  D. Pimm,et al.  The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy , 2007 .

[2]  P. Fensham The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research , 2009 .

[3]  J. Hsu Comparing the relationships between mathematics achievement and student characteristics in Canada and Hong Kong through HLM , 2007 .

[4]  John Cresswell,et al.  Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy : a framework for PISA 2006 , 2006 .

[5]  Todd Milford,et al.  Multilevel Modeling with HLM: Taking a Second Look at PISA , 2009 .

[6]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Quality research in literacy and science education : international perspectives and gold standards , 2009 .

[7]  E. Moje Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change , 2008 .

[8]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[9]  Geoff N Masters,et al.  Measuring student knowledge and skills : the PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy , 2000 .

[10]  S. Ross Motivation correlates of academic achievement: exploring how motivation influences academic achievement in the PISA 2003 dataset , 2008 .

[11]  Andreas Schleicher Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment. , 1999 .

[12]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy , 2008 .

[13]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[14]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education , 2009 .

[15]  Todd M. Milford An investigation of international science achievement using the OECD’s PISA 2006 data set , 2009 .

[16]  R. Bybee,et al.  Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA 2006 science , 2009 .

[17]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Using Large-scale Assessment Datasets for Research in Science and Mathematics Education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) , 2007 .

[18]  J. Lavonen,et al.  Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results , 2009 .