ER and HER 2 expression are positively correlated in HER 2 non-overexpressing breast cancer

Introduction: Estrogen receptor-a (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity are inversely correlated by standard criteria. However, we investigated the quantitative relation between ER and HER2 expression at both RNA and protein levels in HER2+ve and HER2-ve breast carcinomas. Methods: ER and HER2 levels were assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and (for HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (q-RT-PCR) in formalin-fixed primary breast cancers from 448 patients in the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trial (ABC) tamoxifen-only arm. Relations at the RNA level were assessed in 1,139 TransATAC tumors. Results: ER and HER2 RNA levels were negatively correlated as expected in HER2+ve (IHC 3+ and/or FISHamplified) tumors (r = -0.45; P = 0.0028). However, in HER2-ve tumors (ER+ve and ER-ve combined), a significant positive correlation was found (r = 0.43; P < 0.0001), HER2 RNA levels being 1.74-fold higher in ER+ve versus ER-ve tumors. This correlation was maintained in the ER+veHER2-ve subgroup (r = 0.24; P = 0.0023) and confirmed in this subgroup in 1,139 TransATAC tumours (r = 0.25; P < 0.0001). The positive relation extended to IHC-detected ER in ABC: mean ± 95% confidence interval (CI) H-scores were 90 ± 19 and 134 ± 19 for 0 and 1+ HER2 IHC categories, respectively (P = 0.0013). A trend toward lower relapse-free survival (RFS) was observed in patients with the lowest levels of ER and HER2 RNA levels within the ER+veHER2-ve subgroup both for ABC and TransATAC cohorts. Conclusions: ER and HER2 expression is positively correlated in HER2-ve tumors. The distinction between HER2+ve and HER2-ve is greater in ER-ve than in ER+ve tumors. These findings are important to consider in clinical trials of anti-HER2 and anti-endocrine therapy in HER2-ve disease. Trial Registration: Clinical trial identifier: ISRCTN31514446. Introduction Estrogen receptor-a (ER) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are the two key biomarkers that segregate the most distinct biologic subgroups of breast cancer and presently direct adjuvant treatment of primary disease. ER is expressed in approximately 80% of all breast cancers [1]. Amplification or overexpression of HER2 or both are present in about 15% of breast cancers [2,3]. The importance of these receptors as predictive biomarkers has been underpinned by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP), who have issued guidelines for their accurate testing [4,5]. In HER2-overexpressing (HER2+ve) metastatic cancer, treatment with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy improves time to progression and survival [6]. In the adjuvant setting, sequential or concurrent trastuzumab improves disease-free survival and, in some trials, overall survival [7-9]. Despite its recognized benefit in HER2+ve disease, some evidence suggests this benefit also extends to HER2-non-overexpressing/normal (HER2-ve) cancer. Paik and colleagues [10] showed that patients with normal HER2 copy number and protein * Correspondence: Mitch.Dowsett@icr.ac.uk Academic Department of Biochemistry, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Pinhel et al. Breast Cancer Research 2012, 14:R46 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/14/2/R46 © 2012 Dowsett et al.; (Should this be Pinhel et al?) licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. levels lower than 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may also benefit from trastuzumab. The NSABP B-47 (NCT 01275677) trial is now recruiting women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ FISH-ve) invasive breast cancer to address these observations prospectively. HER2 overexpression is associated with partial resistance to endocrine treatment [11-15]. The complex cross-talk between ER and HER2 pathways might be an underlying cause of resistance, although the intrinsic biologic mechanism is poorly understood [16,17]. Some aspects of the relation between ER and HER2 expression have been described previously. ER and HER2 positivity are inversely correlated [18-20], leading to approximately 10% of ER+ve tumors being HER2+ve [21] and about 50% of HER2+ve being ER+ve [22]. ER expression has also been shown to be quantitatively higher in HER2-ve than in HER2+ve tumors among ER+ve tumors; however, few analyses have been conducted on the quantitative relation within the HER2-ve subgroup [23]. In addition, little evidence exists for the biologic importance of IHC 1+ versus 0 levels of HER2 expression, with both categories currently classified as HER2ve. It is unclear whether IHC 1+ cases arise as an artifact of staining or reflect a true difference in expression [10]. Furthermore, few data examine the relation between transcript levels and protein expression by IHC for HER2, even though this relation is well documented for ER [24]. We have therefore (a) characterized gene expression, protein, and/or amplification levels for ER and HER2 individually; (b) explored the relation between ER and HER2 at both the protein and RNA levels, irrespective of the samples ER and HER2 status; and (c) evaluated the significance of transcript levels within the HER2-ve population and, in particular, the ER+veHER2-ve/subgroup in terms of relapse-free survival in a set of 448 early breast cancers from the NCRI Adjuvant Breast Cancer (ABC) Trial-Tamoxifen Late Relapse Study [25,26]. Materials and methods

[1]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  M. Dieci,et al.  Anti-HER2 neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in HER2 positive breast cancer. , 2010, Cancer treatment reviews.

[3]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Holger Sültmann,et al.  ERBB2 and TOP2A in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Amplification, RNA Levels, and Protein Expression and Their Influence on Prognosis and Prediction , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Multiplexed assessment of the Southwest Oncology Group-directed Intergroup Breast Cancer Trial S9313 by AQUA shows that both high and low levels of HER2 are associated with poor outcome. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[7]  E. Perez,et al.  Results of Chemotherapy Alone, with Sequential or Concurrent Addition of 52 Weeks of Trastuzumab in the NCCTG N9831 HER2-Positive Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trial. , 2009 .

[8]  Saeed Sadeghi,et al.  Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Robert L. Sutherland,et al.  Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[10]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Selection of REFERENCE Genes for Normalization of qRT-PCR Data Derived From FFPE Breast Tumors , 2009, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[11]  John M Lambert,et al.  Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. , 2008, Cancer research.

[12]  Edith A Perez,et al.  Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. Royston,et al.  Interactions between treatment and continuous covariates: a step toward individualizing therapy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Paik,et al.  Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Rachel Schiff,et al.  Crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and the HER tyrosine kinase receptor family: molecular mechanism and clinical implications for endocrine therapy resistance. , 2008, Endocrine reviews.

[17]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  HER2 Status and Benefit from Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer , 2008 .

[18]  E. Perez,et al.  Updated results of the combined analysis of NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 adjuvant chemotherapy with/without trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer , 2007 .

[19]  H. Earl,et al.  Ovarian ablation or suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: results from the international adjuvant breast cancer ovarian ablation or suppression randomized trial. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[21]  M. Ellis,et al.  Estrogen-independent proliferation is present in estrogen-receptor HER2-positive primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant letrozole. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Coindre,et al.  The prognostic value of c-erbB2 in primary breast carcinomas: A study on 942 cases , 1995, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[24]  Gottfried Konecny,et al.  Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[26]  F. Speleman,et al.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes , 2002, Genome Biology.

[27]  D B Evans,et al.  Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  D. Miles,et al.  Overexpression of c-erbB2 is an independent marker of resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  S. Ménard,et al.  C-erbB-2 Expression in Primary Breast Cancer , 1999, The International journal of biological markers.

[32]  S. Bull,et al.  neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D. Slamon,et al.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  M. Fernö,et al.  ERBB2 amplification is associated with tamoxifen resistance in steroid-receptor positive breast cancer. , 1994, Cancer letters.

[35]  J. Cairns,et al.  Relationship between c-erbB-2 protein product expression and response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[37]  D. Mutch,et al.  Immunohistochemical analyses of estrogen receptor in endometrial adenocarcinoma using a monoclonal antibody. , 1986, Cancer research.