Restoring Facial Shape in Face Lifting: The Role of Skeletal Support in Facial Analysis and Midface Soft-Tissue Repositioning (Baker Gordon Sympsium Cosmetic Series)

Summary: Aesthetic analysis in facial rejuvenation has traditionally been subordinate to technical solutions. While concerns regarding correction of facial laxity, a reduction in the depth of the nasolabial fold, and improvement of both the jowl and the jawline are worthy goals in rhytidectomy, the aesthetic concept of restoring facial shape to a more youthful appearance is equally important. Restoring facial shape in face lifting requires an understanding of how the face ages and then the formulation of a treatment plan that is individualized for the patient. Re-establishment of facial contour is significantly influenced by the re-elevation of descended facial fat through superficial musculoaponeurotic system manipulation; it can be approached through a variety of technical solutions. Underlying skeletal support affects not only the appearance of the face in youth but also how the face ages and influences the operative plan in terms of the requirements for fat repositioning. Formulating a treatment plan that is patient specific and based on the artistic goals as influenced by skeletal support is the key element for consistency in restoring facial shape in face lifting.

[1]  D. Baker,et al.  Lateral SMASectomy , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  S. Hamra,et al.  Skoog Rhytidectomy: A Five‐Year Experience with 577 Patients , 1980, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  B. Cannon.  Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements , 1975 .

[4]  B. Mendelson.  Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  O. Ramirez.  The subperiosteal approach for the correction of the deep nasolabial fold and the central third of the face. , 1995, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[6]  J. W. Little.  Volumetric perceptions in midfacial aging with altered priorities for rejuvenation. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Stuzin,et al.  Refinements in face lifting: enhanced facial contour using vicryl mesh incorporated into SMAS fixation. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  V Mitz,et al.  THE SUPERFICIAL MUSCULO‐APONEUROTIC SYSTEM (SMAS) IN THE PAROTID AND CHEEK AREA , 1976, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  T. J. Baker,et al.  Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. , 1995, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[10]  Y. Levet,et al.  Parotid Fascia and Face Lifting: A Critical Evaluation of the SMAS Concept , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  T. J. Baker,et al.  The Relationship of the Superficial and Deep Facial Fascias: Relevance to Rhytidectomy and Aging , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  J. Owsley.  SMAS-platysma facelift. A bidirectional cervicofacial rhytidectomy. , 1983, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[13]  R. Calabria.  Deep plane rhytidectomy. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  S R Coleman,et al.  Structural fat grafting. , 1998, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[15]  S. Hamra.  Composite Rhytidectomy , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  J. W. Little.  Three-dimensional rejuvenation of the midface: volumetric resculpture by malar imbrication. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  V. Lambros.  Fat contouring in the face and neck. , 1992, Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

[18]  J. Owsley.  Update : lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds , 1993 .

[19]  T. Hester.  The trans-blepharoplasty approach to lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation revisited: the role and technique of canthoplasty. , 1998, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[20]  B. Mendelson.  Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: Extended SMAS Dissection with Periosteal Fixation , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  P. Tonnard,et al.  Optimising Results from Minimal Access Cranial Suspension Lifting (MACS-Lift) , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[22]  Bruce F. Connell,et al.  The trifurcated SMAS flap: Three-part segmentation of the conventional flap for improved results in the midface, cheek, and neck , 1995, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[23]  J. Owsley.  Continuing Medical Education Examination—Facial Aesthetic Surgery Lifting the Malar Fat Pad for Correction of Prominent Nasolabial Folds , 1999 .

[24]  S. Hamra.  The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  T J Marten,et al.  Facelift. Planning and technique. , 1997, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[26]  A. Daniller,et al.  The Submuscular Aponeurotic System (SMAS): A Histologic and Comparative Anatomy Evaluation , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  Owsley Jq.  SMAS-platysma facelift. A bidirectional cervicofacial rhytidectomy. , 1983 .

[28]  D W Furnas,et al.  The Retaining Ligaments of the Cheek , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  F. Barton.  Rhytidectomy and the Nasolabial Fold , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[30]  T. J. Baker,et al.  Surgical Rejuvenation of the Face , 1986 .

[31]  H. Gruber,et al.  Surgical Anatomy of the Mimic Muscle System and the Facial Nerve: Importance for Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery , 1987, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.