Estimating the safety effects of lane widths on urban streets in Nebraska using the propensity scores-potential outcomes framework.

A sufficient understanding of the safety impact of lane widths in urban areas is necessary to produce geometric designs that optimize safety performance for all users. The overarching trend found in the research literature is that as lane widths narrow, crash frequency increases. However, this trend is inconsistent and is the result of multiple cross-sectional studies that have issues related to lack of control for potential confounding variables, unobserved heterogeneity or omitted variable bias, or endogeneity among independent variables, among others. Using ten years of mid-block crash data on urban arterials and collectors from four cities in Nebraska, crash modification factors (CMFs) were estimated for various lane widths and crash types. These CMFs were developed using the propensity scores-potential outcomes methodology. This method reduces many of the issues associated with cross-sectional regression models when estimating the safety effects of infrastructure-related design features. Generalized boosting, a non-parametric modeling technique, was used to estimate the propensity scores. Matching was performed using both Nearest Neighbor and Mahalanobis matching techniques. CMF estimation was done using mixed-effects negative binomial or Poisson regression with the matched data. Lane widths included in the analysis included 9ft, 10ft, 11ft, and 12ft. Some of the estimated CMFs were point estimates while others were functions of traffic volume (i.e., the CMF changed depending on the traffic volume). Roadways with 10ft travel lanes were found to experience the highest crash frequency relative to other lane widths. Meanwhile, roads with 9ft travel lanes were found to experience the lowest relative crash frequency. While this may be due to increased driver caution when traveling on narrow lanes, it is possible that unobserved factors influenced this result. CMFs for target crash types (sideswipe same-direction and sideswipe opposite-direction) were consistent with the values currently used in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM).

[1]  Lawrence C McCandless,et al.  Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Matthias Schonlau,et al.  Boosted Regression (Boosting): An Introductory Tutorial and a Stata Plugin , 2005 .

[3]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  OBSERVATIONAL BEFORE-AFTER STUDIES IN ROAD SAFETY -- ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEASURES ON ROAD SAFETY , 1997 .

[4]  Li-Yen Chang,et al.  Analysis of freeway accident frequencies: Negative binomial regression versus artificial neural network , 2005 .

[5]  Robert B Noland,et al.  The effect of infrastructure and demographic change on traffic-related fatalities and crashes: a case study of Illinois county-level data. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mastering 'Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect , 2014 .

[7]  S. Miaou.  The relationship between truck accidents and geometric design of road sections: Poisson versus negative binomial regressions. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Use of Propensity Score Matching Method and Hybrid Bayesian Method to Estimate Crash Modification Factors of Signal Installation , 2006 .

[9]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[10]  John N. Ivan,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Safety Performance Functions for Two-Lane Highways Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Modeling , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Y. Park,et al.  Reducing Treatment Selection Bias for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Propensity Score Method , 2007 .

[12]  D. Rubin.  Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate , 1976 .

[13]  Alan R. Ellis,et al.  The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[15]  D B Dunson,et al.  Commentary: practical advantages of Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  James G Strathman,et al.  Analysis of design attributes and crashes on the Oregon highway system. , 2001, Applied health economics and health policy.

[17]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  Propensity Score Analysis , 2015 .

[18]  Weihua An,et al.  4. Bayesian Propensity Score Estimators: Incorporating Uncertainties in Propensity Scores into Causal Inference , 2010 .

[19]  William M. Holmes,et al.  Using Propensity Scores in Quasi-Experimental Designs , 2013 .

[20]  Daniel Westreich,et al.  Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[22]  M Alan Brookhart,et al.  Analytic strategies to adjust confounding using exposure propensity scores and disease risk scores: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and short-term mortality in the elderly. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  F Mannering,et al.  Effect of roadway geometrics and environmental factors on rural freeway accident frequencies. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[25]  T. Church,et al.  Invited commentary: advancing propensity score methods in epidemiology. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments , 2004 .

[27]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  Seven Rules for Social Research , 2008 .

[28]  Frank Gross,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width Combinations on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Roads , 2009 .

[29]  R. Price,et al.  Rapid Clinical Assessment to Facilitate the Triage of Adults with Falciparum Malaria, a Retrospective Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Speed and road accidents : an evaluation of the power model , 2004 .

[31]  Richard J. Porter,et al.  Safety Impacts of Design Exceptions on Nonfreeway Segments , 2013 .

[32]  R. D'Agostino.  Propensity Scores in Cardiovascular Research , 2007, Circulation.

[33]  M. Hadi,et al.  ESTIMATING SAFETY EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION DESIGN FOR VARIOUS HIGHWAY TYPES USING NEGATIVE BINOMIAL REGRESSION , 1995 .

[34]  Ariel Linden,et al.  Using Propensity Scores to Construct Comparable Control Groups for Disease Management Program Evaluation , 2005 .

[35]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Comparison of safety effect estimates obtained from empirical Bayes before-after study, propensity scores-potential outcomes framework, and regression model with cross-sectional data. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata , 2005 .

[38]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  R. Porter,et al.  Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design on Urban and Suburban Roads , 2013 .

[40]  Marie Kruse,et al.  Costs of traffic injuries , 2013, Injury Prevention.

[41]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Application of propensity scores and potential outcomes to estimate effectiveness of traffic safety countermeasures: Exploratory analysis using intersection lighting data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  E. Topol,et al.  Propensity Analysis of Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk Features , 2004, Circulation.

[43]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[44]  Paul P Jovanis,et al.  Estimation of the Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width: Case-Control Approach , 2007 .

[45]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  A comparative Full Bayesian before-and-after analysis and application to urban road safety countermeasures in New Jersey. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[46]  Ahmed E. Radwan,et al.  Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[47]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[48]  John F. Thompson.  Bayesian Analysis with Stata , 2014 .

[49]  Shanthi Ameratunga,et al.  What Influences the Association between Previous and Future Crashes among Cyclists? A Propensity Score Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[50]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Causal inference in transportation safety studies: Comparison of potential outcomes and causal diagrams , 2011, 1107.4855.

[51]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2958.

[52]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[53]  Raluca Mihăescu,et al.  RE: ‘‘TRENDS IN ASTHMA PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE IN ONTARIO, , 2011 .

[54]  J. Hilbe.  Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[55]  Corwin M Zigler,et al.  Model Feedback in Bayesian Propensity Score Estimation , 2013, Biometrics.

[56]  Lekshmi Sasidharan,et al.  Propensity scores-potential outcomes framework to incorporate severity probabilities in the highway safety manual crash prediction algorithm. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[57]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score , 2000 .