Distributed multilevel optimization for complex structures

Optimization problems concerning complex structures with many design variables may entail an unacceptable computational cost. This problem can be reduced considerably with a multilevel approach: A structure consisting of several components is optimized as a whole (global) as well as on the component level. In this paper, an optimization method is discussed with applications in the assessment of the impact of new design considerations in the development of a structure. A strategy based on fully stressed design is applied for optimization problems in linear statics. A global model is used to calculate the interactions (e.g., loads) for each of the components. These components are then optimized using the prescribed interactions, followed by a new global calculation to update the interactions. Mixed discrete and continuous design variables as well as different design configurations are possible. An application of this strategy is presented in the form of the full optimization of a vertical tail plane center box of a generic large passenger aircraft. In linear dynamics, the parametrization of the component interactions is problematic due to the frequency dependence. Hence, a modified method is presented in which the speed of component mode synthesis is used to avoid this parametrization. This method is applied to a simple test case that originates from noise control.

[1]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[2]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  M.H.H. Oude nijhuis,et al.  Analysis tools for the design of active structural acoustic control systems , 2003 .

[4]  Dingding Chen,et al.  Optimal use of regularization and cross-validation in neural network modeling , 1999, IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339).

[5]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[6]  Kok Wai Wong,et al.  Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Optimization Frameworks for High-Fidelity Engineering Design Problems , 2005 .

[7]  Roy R. Craig,et al.  Structural Dynamics: An Introduction to Computer Methods , 1981 .

[8]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  A Practical Bayesian Framework for Backpropagation Networks , 1992, Neural Computation.

[9]  Jorg Onno Entzinger,et al.  Multilevel distributed structure optimization , 2003 .

[10]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski,et al.  A Mixed Optimization Method for Automated Design of Fuselage Structures , 1972 .

[11]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[12]  Jelmer Wind.  A global-local optimization method for problems in structural dynamics , 2006 .

[13]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Multilevel optimization of space trusses using continuum modelling , 1994 .

[14]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  THEORETICAL AND NUMERICAL CONSTRAINT-HANDLING TECHNIQUES USED WITH EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A SURVEY OF THE STATE OF THE ART , 2002 .

[15]  Fred van Keulen,et al.  Efficient Finite-Difference Design-Sensitivities , 2004 .

[16]  W. Ruijter,et al.  Optimization of composite panels using neural networks and genetic algorithms , 2003 .

[17]  J. Huisman.  The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[18]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[19]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[20]  Laszlo Berke.  Structural optimization of large structural systems by optimality criteria methods , 1992 .

[21]  Alan F. Murray,et al.  International Joint Conference on Neural Networks , 1993 .

[22]  R. Spallino,et al.  Feedback-based neutral networks in structural optimisation of aerospace structures , 2003 .

[23]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.