Functional reliability evaluation of an MTR-pool type research reactor core using the load–capacity interference model

Abstract This paper presents the functional reliability evaluation of Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) core in normal operation. The concept of functional reliability, borrowed from reliability physics, uses the well-known resistance–stress or load–capacity interference model that is used in the structural reliability framework. To use the load–capacity interference model, uncertainties of significant parameters in system performance are propagated into system dynamics modeled with RELAP5/Mod 3.2 using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method and exceedance probability (EP) model is used as quantification method. The proposed method in this paper solves a common problem in reliability analysis, i.e., lack of sufficient failure data in specific operating conditions. Although defining failure criteria in normal operation are difficult, this paper focuses on the application of multiple states criteria to determine the status of a system. The status of the reactor core in normal operation is considered multiple states regarding to a performance representative parameter that is temperature in this work. Outlet temperatures of fuel hot and average channels were selected to be performance indicators in normal operation. Consulting with TRR engineers and operators as well as safety analysis report, two failure states were considered exceeding 65.1 °C and 58.9 °C for the hot channel and 50.4 °C and 45.6 °C for the average channel as upper and lower limits respectively. The calculated reliability was 9.1e−01 with 95% of confidence interval, which is in good agreement with experimental results. Using sensitivity analysis in input parameters, it was concluded that the value of the heat transfer coefficient parameter in fuel has the most significant effect on the results.

[1]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  The Impact of Uncertainties on the Performance of Passive Systems , 2005 .

[2]  Jose Reyes,et al.  Natural Circulation in Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Phenomena, models, and methodology for system reliability assessments , 2005 .

[3]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[4]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[5]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Incorporating reliability analysis into the design of passive cooling systems with an application to a gas-cooled reactor , 2008 .

[6]  Timothy A. Wheeler,et al.  Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making , 2009 .

[7]  Christian Kirchsteiger A new approach to quantitative assessment of reliability of passive systems , 2005 .

[8]  Mary Drouin,et al.  Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making (NUREG-1855) , 2009 .

[9]  Saeed Setayeshi,et al.  Human reliability analysis of the Tehran research reactor using the SPAR-H method , 2012 .

[10]  L. Burgazzi Reliability Evaluation of Passive Systems Through Functional Reliability Assessment , 2003 .

[11]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2005 .

[12]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2003 .

[13]  Jalil Jafari,et al.  Loss of coolant accident analyses on Tehran research reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.2 code , 2007 .

[14]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Reliability evaluation of a natural circulation system , 2003 .

[15]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Joon-Eon Yang,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of reliability of passive systems within probabilistic safety assessment framework for VHTR , 2010 .

[17]  Lorenzo P Pagani,et al.  On the quantification of safety margins , 2004 .