The Four Habits Coding Scheme: validation of an instrument to assess clinicians' communication behavior.

OBJECTIVE To present preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), an instrument based on a teaching model used widely throughout Kaiser Permanente to improve clinicians' communication skills. METHODS One hundred videotaped primary care visits were coded using the 4HCS, and the data were assessed against a previously available data set for these visits, including the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), back channel responses, measures of nonverbal behavior, length of visit, and patients' post-visit assessments. RESULTS Levels of inter-rater reliability were acceptable, and the distribution of ratings across items indicated that physicians' modal responses varied widely. Correlations between 4HCS ratings, RIAS, back channel responses, and non-verbal measures provided evidence of the instrument's construct validity. CONCLUSIONS The Four Habits Coding Scheme, an instrument that combines both evaluative and descriptive elements of physician communication behavior and is derived from a conceptually based teaching model, has the potential to be of utility to researchers and evaluators as well as educators and clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The Four Habits Coding Scheme provides a template for both guiding and measuring physician communication behaviors.

[1]  F. Davidoff,et al.  Patient-Centered Medicine: A Professional Evolution , 1996 .

[2]  J P Mullooly,et al.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. , 1997, JAMA.

[3]  Richard M. Frankel,et al.  The Medical Interview , 1995, Frontiers of Primary Care.

[4]  M. Donnelly,et al.  Assessment of Residents' Interpersonal Skills by Faculty Proctors and Standardized Patients: A Psychometric Analysis , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  S. M. Putnam,et al.  Three Functions of the Medical Interview , 1995 .

[6]  L. Del Piccolo,et al.  Inter and intra individual variations in physicians' verbal behaviour during primary care consultations. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[7]  C. P. M. Vleuten,et al.  Reliability and feasibility of measuring medical interviewing skills: the revised Maastricht History‐Taking and Advice Checklist , 1991, Medical education.

[8]  R. Frankel,et al.  Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. , 1999, The Journal of medical practice management : MPM.

[9]  G. Makoul The SEGUE Framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  Jonathan Silverman,et al.  Marrying Content and Process in Clinical Method Teaching: Enhancing the Calgary–Cambridge Guides , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Richard M Frankel,et al.  Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: a longitudinal case study. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Satisfaction, Gender, and Communication in Medical Visits , 1994, Medical care.

[13]  S. M. Putnam,et al.  The biopsychosocial domains and the functions of the medical interview in primary care: construct validity of the Verona Medical Interview Classification System. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  M. Stewart,et al.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[15]  William B Stiles,et al.  Description versus evaluation of medical interviews , 2002, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences.

[16]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. , 1994, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  J. van Dalen,et al.  Teaching and assessing communication skills in Maastricht: the first twenty years , 2001, Medical teacher.

[18]  D. Roter The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. , 2000, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  S. Kurtz,et al.  The Calgary—Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes , 1996, Medical education.

[20]  John P. Mullooly,et al.  Physician-Patient Communication: The Relationship With Malpractice Claims Among Primary Care Physicians and Surgeons , 1997 .

[21]  D. Roter,et al.  The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.