Facial reactions to facial expressions in subjects high and low in public speaking fear.

This study investigated whether subjects high and low in public speaking fear react with different facial electromyographic (EMG) activities when exposed to negative and positive social stimuli. A High-fear and Low-fear group were selected by help of a questionnaire and were exposed to slides of angry and happy faces while facial-EMG from the corrugator and zygomatic muscle regions were measured. The subjects also rated the stimuli on different emotional dimensions. Consistent with earlier research it was found that Low fear subjects reacted with increased corrugator activity to angry faces and increased zygomatic activity to happy faces. The High fear group, on the other hand, did not distinguish between angry and happy faces. Rating data indicated that the High fear group perceived angry faces as being emotionally more negative. The present results are consistent with earlier studies, indicating that the facial-EMG technique is sensitive to detect differential responding among clinical interesting groups, such as people suffering from social fears.

[1]  U. Dimberg.  Facial reactions to fear-relevant stimuli for subjects high and low in specific fear. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  A. J. Fridlund,et al.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[3]  G. Klerman,et al.  Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects , 1976, Science.

[4]  U. Dimberg.  Facial reactions to facial expressions. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[5]  R. Hare,et al.  Autonomic responses to affective visual stimulation. , 1970, Psychophysiology.

[6]  R. Hare,et al.  Orienting and defensive responses to visual stimuli. , 1973, Psychophysiology.

[7]  U. Dimberg,et al.  Facial reactions, autonomic activity and experienced emotion: A three component model of emotional conditioning , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Mats Fredrikson,et al.  Autonomic reactions to social and neutral stimuli in subjects high and low in public speaking fear , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[9]  U. Dimberg,et al.  Facial expressions as excitatory and inhibitory stimuli for conditioned autonomic responses , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[10]  U Dimberg,et al.  Perceived unpleasantness and facial reactions to auditory stimuli. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[11]  M. Fredrikson,et al.  Reliability and validity of some specific fear questionnaires. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[12]  U. Dimberg,et al.  Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions , 1990, Biological Psychology.

[13]  A. J. Fridlund.  Contour-following integrator for dynamic tracking of electromyographic data. , 1979, Psychophysiology.

[14]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: a series of field experiments. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  A. Öhman,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Social Behavior , 1984 .

[17]  K. Strongman,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and conflict in eye contact , 1968 .

[18]  U. Dimberg.  For Distinguished Early Career Contribution to Psychophysiology: Award Address, 1988 , 1990 .

[19]  M. Fredrikson,et al.  Orienting and defensive reactions to phobic and conditioned fear stimuli in phobics and normals. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[20]  U. Dimberg.  Facial reactions to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli , 1986, Biological Psychology.