Positive Welfare Indicators and Their Association with Sustainable Management Systems in Poultry

Animal welfare is a key and distinct component of sustainable agriculture and food security. People, both as citizens and consumers, have become more concerned about the husbandry of livestock species. Positive welfare goes a step further than the common welfare approach, supporting that a good life for animals is not only the alleviation of negative aspects, but also the promotion of positive affectivities. So, a sustainable management system for any livestock species should promote positive aspects in the lives of animals. Poultry is one of the species whose welfare is most impaired, and numerous concerns are raised by society. For all the above, we reviewed the positive welfare indicators that have been studied in livestock poultry and that can be used to promote positive effects and assess welfare for the most common species, i.e., broilers, laying hens, turkeys, ducks, geese, quails and ostriches. We analyzed the results categorized by species, discussed the connection of the indicators with sustainable management, and made proposals for future studies. Exploration and dustbathing have been extensively studied and seem most promising, especially in broilers and laying hens, followed by nesting and perching, and swimming for waterfowl. Qualitative behavioral assessment (QBA) is already applied in protocols for broilers and laying hens, but the results are not as promising due to the homogeneity of the flock and the difficulty in observations. Play has been studied mostly in broilers but is a behavior difficult to recognize and needs further understanding. The results are limited for all species, except broilers and laying hens.

[1]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Better welfare for broiler chickens given more types of environmental enrichments and more space to enjoy them , 2023, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[2]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Novelty during rearing increased inquisitive exploration but was not related to early ranging behavior of laying hens , 2023, Frontiers in Animal Science.

[3]  Shih-Chieh Liao,et al.  Effects of Swimming Pool Conditions and Floor Types on White Roman Geese’s Physical Condition Scores and Behaviors in an Indoor Rearing System , 2022, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[4]  P. Simitzis,et al.  Positive Welfare Indicators in Dairy Animals , 2022, Dairy.

[5]  M. Erasmus,et al.  Behavior and welfare impacts of water provision via misting in commercial Pekin ducks , 2022, Journal of animal science.

[6]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Enhancing their quality of life: environmental enrichment for poultry , 2022, Poultry science.

[7]  I. D. de Jong,et al.  Reducing stocking density benefits behaviour of fast- and slower-growing broilers , 2022, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[8]  H. Blokhuis,et al.  Resting behavior of broilers reared with or without artificial brooders , 2022, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[9]  D. Campbell,et al.  Water for Domestic Ducks: The Benefits and Challenges in Commercial Production , 2022, Frontiers in Animal Science.

[10]  Caroline Lee,et al.  Impacts of Rearing Enrichments on Pullets’ and Free-Range Hens’ Positive Behaviors across the Flock Cycle , 2022, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  L. Keeling,et al.  Towards a Positive Welfare Protocol for Cattle: A Critical Review of Indicators and Suggestion of How We Might Proceed , 2021, Frontiers in Animal Science.

[12]  N. O’Connell,et al.  A comparison of fast growing broiler chickens with a slower-growing breed type reared on Higher Welfare commercial farms , 2021, PloS one.

[13]  T. Widowski,et al.  In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens , 2021, Poultry science.

[14]  G. Arnott,et al.  Environmental complexity positively impacts affective states of broiler chickens , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[15]  S. Abeyesinghe,et al.  Associations between behaviour and health outcomes in conventional and slow-growing breeds of broiler chicken. , 2021, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[16]  M. Alagawany,et al.  Reproductive traits, behavioral and hormonal changes during breeding season in Egyptian Geese under natural photoperiod , 2021, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali.

[17]  M. Boz,et al.  Behavioral traits of artificially and naturally hatched geese in intensive and free-range production systems , 2021 .

[18]  E. Briefer,et al.  Vocalisations in farm animals: A step towards positive welfare assessment , 2021, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[19]  X. Boivin,et al.  The Power of a Positive Human–Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[20]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Slow-growing broilers are healthier and express more behavioural indicators of positive welfare , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Play behaviour reduced by environmental enrichment in fast-growing broiler chickens , 2020 .

[22]  X. Liao,et al.  Lack of access to an open water source for bathing inhibited the development of the preen gland and preening behavior in Sanshui White ducks , 2020, Poultry science.

[23]  D. Weary,et al.  Anticipatory behaviour in animals: A critical review , 2020 .

[24]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Natural behaviours, their drivers and their implications for laying hen welfare , 2020 .

[25]  D. Broom,et al.  Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare , 2020, Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology.

[26]  J. M. Lomillos,et al.  Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[27]  A. B. Riber,et al.  Effects of environmental complexity on behaviour in fast-growing broiler chickens , 2019, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[28]  F. Napolitano,et al.  How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants? , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[29]  B. Vigors Citizens’ and Farmers’ Framing of ‘Positive Animal Welfare’ and the Implications for Framing Positive Welfare in Communication , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[30]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Effects of environmental enrichment on activity and lameness in commercial broiler production , 2019, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[31]  A. Darmaillacq,et al.  Human behaviour at the origin of maternal effects on offspring behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) , 2019, Physiology & Behavior.

[32]  R. Moe,et al.  Associations between qualitative behaviour assessments and measures of leg health, fear and mortality in Norwegian broiler chicken flocks , 2019, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[33]  T. Widowski,et al.  The effects of floor space and nest box access on the physiology and behavior of caged laying hens , 2019, Poultry science.

[34]  D. Blache,et al.  Differences in Pre-Laying Behavior between Floor-Laying and Nest-Laying Pekin Ducks , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[35]  T. Howell,et al.  Engagement through online discussion: perceptions of laying hen welfare in furnished cages. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[36]  J. Lusk Consumer preferences for and beliefs about slow growth chicken , 2018, Poultry science.

[37]  C. Bir,et al.  Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems , 2018, Poultry science.

[38]  H. Würbel,et al.  Use of aerial perches and perches on aviary tiers by broiler breeders , 2018, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[39]  L. Keeling,et al.  Towards Farm Animal Welfare and Sustainability , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[40]  T. Widowski,et al.  Curtained nests facilitate settled nesting behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages , 2018 .

[41]  L. Keeling,et al.  Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[42]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Swiss consumers’ willingness to pay and attitudes regarding dual‐purpose poultry and eggs , 2018, Poultry science.

[43]  S. Morand,et al.  The One Health Concept: 10 Years Old and a Long Road Ahead , 2018, Front. Vet. Sci..

[44]  G. Mason,et al.  Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states? , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[45]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Flock size during rearing affects pullet behavioural synchrony and spatial clustering , 2017 .

[46]  Clive J. C. Phillips,et al.  Hens vary their vocal repertoire and structure when anticipating different types of reward , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  G. Hinch,et al.  Early enrichment in free-range laying hens: effects on ranging behaviour, welfare and response to stressors. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[48]  M. Erhard,et al.  Behavior as welfare indicator for the rearing of broilers in an enriched husbandry environment—A field study , 2017 .

[49]  L. Frewer,et al.  Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies , 2017 .

[50]  F. J. van der Staay,et al.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research , 2017, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[51]  L. Kostál,et al.  The effects of housing conditions on judgement bias in Japanese quail , 2016 .

[52]  A. Valros,et al.  The use of perches and platforms by broiler chickens , 2016 .

[53]  M. Appleby,et al.  One Welfare – a platform for improving human and animal welfare , 2016, Veterinary Record.

[54]  P. Fleming,et al.  The contribution of qualitative behavioural assessment to appraisal of livestock welfare , 2016 .

[55]  T. Widowski,et al.  Rearing environment and laying location affect pre-laying behaviour in enriched cages , 2016 .

[56]  C. Nicol,et al.  Consumer perceptions of free range laying hen welfare , 2016 .

[57]  M. Mendl,et al.  A Screen-Peck Task for Investigating Cognitive Bias in Laying Hens , 2016, PloS one.

[58]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space , 2016 .

[59]  J. Webster Animal Welfare: Freedoms, Dominions and “A Life Worth Living” , 2016, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[60]  A. Nurse Beyond the property debate: animal welfare as a public good , 2016 .

[61]  M. Makagon,et al.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary1 , 2016, Poultry science.

[62]  David J. Mellor,et al.  Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living” , 2016, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[63]  S. Held,et al.  Influences of Maternal Care on Chicken Welfare , 2016, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[64]  E. Paul,et al.  Effects of maternal vocalisations on the domestic chick stress response , 2015 .

[65]  E. Paul,et al.  Social buffering in a bird , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Chisako Oyakawa,et al.  Effect of Environmental Enrichment on the Behavior and Welfare of Japanese Broilers at a Commercial Farm , 2015 .

[67]  J. Marchant-Forde The Science of Animal Behavior and Welfare: Challenges, Opportunities, and Global Perspective , 2015, Front. Vet. Sci..

[68]  Caroline Lee,et al.  Acute stress enhances sensitivity to a highly attractive food reward without affecting judgement bias in laying hens , 2015 .

[69]  D. Mellor Positive animal welfare states and encouraging environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[70]  I. Duncan,et al.  Evidence of competition for nest sites by laying hens in large furnished cages , 2014 .

[71]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare. , 2013, Poultry science.

[72]  Yan Heng,et al.  Consumer Attitudes toward Farm-Animal Welfare: The Case of Laying Hens , 2013 .

[73]  I. Malecki,et al.  Extensive human presence at an early age of ostriches improves the docility of birds at a later stage of life , 2013 .

[74]  J. E. Bolhuis,et al.  Fear, stress, and feather pecking in commercial white and brown laying hen parent-stock flocks and their relationships with production parameters. , 2013, Poultry science.

[75]  I. Zulkifli,et al.  Review of human-animal interactions and their impact on animal productivity and welfare , 2013, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[76]  D. Main,et al.  Towards a ‘Good Life’ for Farm Animals: Development of a Resource Tier Framework to Achieve Positive Welfare for Laying Hens , 2013, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[77]  E. de Margerie,et al.  Effect of mothering on the spatial exploratory behavior of quail chicks. , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.

[78]  P. Hocking,et al.  Traditional and commercial turkeys show similar susceptibility to foot pad dermatitis and behavioural evidence of pain , 2013, British Poultry Science.

[79]  R. Freire,et al.  The welfare of laying hens in conventional cages and alternative systems: first steps towards a quantitative comparison , 2013 .

[80]  C. Molento,et al.  Quail (Coturnixcoturnix japonica) welfare in two confinement systems , 2012 .

[81]  L. Keeling,et al.  Cognitive bias and anticipatory behaviour of laying hens housed in basic and enriched pens , 2012 .

[82]  R. Moe,et al.  Peripheral temperature drop in response to anticipation and consumption of a signaled palatable reward in laying hens (Gallus domesticus) , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[83]  G. Cronin,et al.  The importance of pre-laying behaviour and nest boxes for laying hen welfare: a review , 2012 .

[84]  M. Špinka Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare , 2012 .

[85]  I. Estevez,et al.  Access to Barrier Perches Improves Behavior Repertoire in Broilers , 2012, PloS one.

[86]  J. C. Lowe,et al.  Avian maternal response to chick distress , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[87]  V. Boere,et al.  Behaviour of captive Ostrich chicks from 10 days to 5 months of age , 2011 .

[88]  M. Špinka,et al.  Animal play and animal welfare , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[89]  L. Keeling,et al.  Behaviour of domestic fowl in anticipation of positive and negative stimuli , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[90]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare , 2011 .

[91]  Per Jensen,et al.  Domestication effects on behavioural synchronization and individual distances in chickens (Gallus gallus) , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[92]  C. Tucker,et al.  Factors affecting nest choice by Pekin ducks , 2011 .

[93]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Behavioural and physiological responses of laying hens to humans , 2010 .

[94]  D. Fraser,et al.  On-farm welfare assessment for regulatory purposes: issues and possible solutions. , 2010 .

[95]  Temple Grandin,et al.  Improving animal welfare: a practical approach , 2009 .

[96]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Behaviour, synchrony and welfare of Pekin ducks in relation to water use. , 2009 .

[97]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not. , 2009, Poultry science.

[98]  Richard M A Parker,et al.  Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms , 2009 .

[99]  G. Alvino,et al.  Behavioural time budgets of broiler chickens reared in varying light intensities , 2009 .

[100]  J. Mench,et al.  Effects of feed- and water-based enrichment on activity and cannibalism in Muscovy ducklings , 2008 .

[101]  S. Waiblinger,et al.  Reaction of laying hens to humans in the home or a novel environment , 2008 .

[102]  Alexandra C. Kuchar,et al.  Habituation to humans affects yolk steroid levels and offspring phenotype in quail , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[103]  K. Uetake,et al.  Pecking behaviour of laying hens in single-tiered aviaries with and without outdoor area , 2008, British poultry science.

[104]  S. Waiblinger,et al.  Validation of tests for on-farm assessment of the hen–human relationship in non-cage systems , 2008 .

[105]  D C J Main,et al.  Assessment of positive welfare: a review. , 2008, Veterinary journal.

[106]  L. Keeling,et al.  Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[107]  S. Waiblinger,et al.  Development of on-farm methods to assess the animal-human relationship in laying hens kept in non-cage systems , 2007, Animal Welfare.

[108]  D J T Sumpter,et al.  The feeding dynamics of broiler chickens , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[109]  X. Boivin,et al.  Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review , 2006 .

[110]  M. Naguib,et al.  The effects of short term enrichment on learning in chickens from a laying strain (Gallus gallus domesticus) , 2006 .

[111]  J. Mench,et al.  The differential effects of four types of environmental enrichment on the activity budgets, fearfulness, and social proximity preference of Japanese quail , 2005 .

[112]  L. Keeling,et al.  Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective , 2005 .

[113]  A. Bertin,et al.  Mothering during early development influences subsequent emotional and social behaviour in Japanese quail. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Comparative experimental biology.

[114]  I. Duncan,et al.  Frustrated nesting behaviour: Relation to extra-cuticular shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens , 2003, British poultry science.

[115]  L. Keeling,et al.  How important is social facilitation for dustbathing in laying hens , 2002 .

[116]  I. Zulkifli,et al.  The effects of regular visual contact with human beings on fear, stress, antibody and growth responses in broiler chickens , 2002 .

[117]  J. Faure,et al.  Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens , 2002 .

[118]  H. A. Elson,et al.  Development of furnished cages for laying hens , 2002, British poultry science.

[119]  L. Keeling,et al.  The Push-Door for Measuring Motivation in Hens: Laying Hens are Motivated to Perch at Night , 2002, Animal Welfare.

[120]  The domestic turkey, Meleagris gallopavo , 2001 .

[121]  M. Mendl,et al.  Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[122]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Group size and perching behaviour in young domestic fowl. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[123]  B. Spruijt,et al.  A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[124]  I. Estevez,et al.  Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[125]  Koene,et al.  The vocal expression of feeding motivation and frustration in the domestic laying hen, Gallus gallus domesticus. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[126]  F. Mcmillan,et al.  Quality of life in animals. , 2000, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[127]  Olsson,et al.  Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[128]  Duncan,et al.  Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[129]  L. Keeling,et al.  Rearing without early access to perches impairs the spatial skills of laying hens. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[130]  M. Mendl,et al.  The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[131]  D. Huonnic,et al.  Influence of stocking density on behavioural, health and productivity traits of turkeys in large flocks. , 1999, British poultry science.

[132]  J. Hurnik,et al.  Synchronization of behavior among laying hens in battery cages , 1994 .

[133]  M. Appleby,et al.  Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens , 1992 .

[134]  S. Maloney,et al.  Pekin ducks are motivated to lay in their preferred nest substrate , 2023, Animal Welfare.

[135]  R. Melchior,et al.  Behavior of domestic chickens – insights from a narrative review , 2022 .

[136]  D. Broom Farm animal welfare: A key component of the sustainability of farming systems , 2021, Veterinarski glasnik.

[137]  C. Dwyer Can Improving Animal Welfare Contribute to Sustainability and Productivity , 2020 .

[138]  N. O’Connell,et al.  Play behaviour, fear responses and activity levels in commercial broiler chickens provided with preferred environmental enrichments. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[139]  J. Rault Be kind to others: Prosocial behaviours and their implications for animal welfare , 2019, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[140]  Randi Oppermann Moe,et al.  The effects of food-related environmental complexity on litter directed behaviour, fear and exploration of novel stimuli in young broiler chickens , 2016 .

[141]  A. McElligott,et al.  The Use of Judgement Bias to Assess Welfare in Farm Livestock , 2015 .

[142]  Yujie Chen,et al.  Effect of production system on welfare traits, growth performance and meat quality of ducks , 2015 .

[143]  G. Mason,et al.  Animal Welfare Science: Recent Publication Trends and Future Research Priorities , 2014 .

[144]  I. Zulkifli,et al.  Changes in heat shock protein 70, blood parameters, and fear-related behavior in broiler chickens as affected by pleasant and unpleasant human contact. , 2013, Poultry science.

[145]  K. Dzama,et al.  Foster parenting, human imprinting and conventional handling affects survival and early weight of ostrich chicks. , 2012 .

[146]  Christine J Nicol,et al.  The Ethology of Domestic Animals: an introductory text , 2009 .