Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description

I argue that the following two assumptions are incorrect: (i) The properties of the innate Universal Grammar can be discovered by comparing language systems, and (ii) functional explanation of language structure presupposes a “correct”, i.e. cognitively realistic, description. Thus, there are two ways in which linguistic explanation does not presuppose linguistic description. The generative program of building cross-linguistic generalizations into the hypothesized Universal Grammar cannot succeed because the actually observed generalizations are typically one-way implications or implicational scales, and because they typically have exceptions. The cross-linguistic generalizations are much more plausibly due to functional factors. I distinguish sharply between “phenomenological description” (which makes no claims about mental reality) and “cognitively realistic description”, and I show that for functional explanation, phenomenological description is sufficient.

[1]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[2]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[3]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Explaining Article-Possessor Complementarity: Economic Motivation in Noun Phrase Syntax. , 1999 .

[4]  周谟智.  Language and Linguistics:An Introduction , 1983 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Language and problems of knowledge : the Managua lectures , 1990 .

[6]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A Formalist's Reading of Some Functionalist Work in Syntax , 1999 .

[7]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[8]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Learning Constraint Subhierarchies: The Bidirectional Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2004 .

[9]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals , 1999 .

[10]  Mark C. Baker.  The Atoms of Language , 1987 .

[11]  M. Hale,et al.  Substance Abuse and Dysfunctionalism: Current Trends in Phonology , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[12]  R. Lieber.  Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory , 1992 .

[13]  D. Lightfoot.  The development of language , 1999 .

[14]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[15]  Joan L. Bybee.  Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[16]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[17]  W. Bruce Croft.  Typology and Universals , 1990 .

[18]  Jean E. Newman,et al.  Are stem changes as natural as affixes? , 1995 .

[19]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[20]  Bruce Bagemihl,et al.  Alternate phonologies and morphologies , 1988 .

[21]  P. Keating,et al.  Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops , 1983 .

[22]  J. Hawkins.  PROCESSING COMPLEXITY AND FILLER-GAP DEPENDENCIES ACROSS GRAMMARS , 1999 .

[23]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals , 1998 .

[24]  R. Lass.  Historical linguistics and language change , 1997 .

[25]  Kim M. Isaac.  What About Linguistic Diversity? , 2001, Language and Nationality.

[26]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[27]  F. Newmeyer.  Language Form And Language Function , 1998 .

[28]  John Haiman,et al.  Iconic and Economic Motivation , 1983 .

[29]  D. Gil.  Ludlings in Malayic Languages : An Introduction , 2002 .

[30]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[31]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Optimality and diachronic adaptation , 1999 .

[32]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[33]  M. Tomasello.  Language is not an instinct , 1995 .

[34]  Neil Smith,et al.  Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant , 1993 .

[35]  K. Versteegh.  Esperanto as a first language: language acquisition with a restricted input , 1993 .

[36]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[37]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  SVO languages and the OV: VO typology , 1991, Journal of Linguistics.

[38]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[39]  Michael Darnell.  Functionalism and formalism in linguistics , 1999 .

[40]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and Basic Linguistic Theory , 2006 .

[41]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[42]  M. Dryer.  Functionalism and the Metalanguage - Theory Confusion , 1999 .

[43]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[44]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[45]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[46]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Word order universals , 1983 .

[47]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .