Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope's rule

Cope's rule, the tendency for lineages to evolve to larger body size, is widely seen as a pervasive evolutionary pattern1–4. However, only a few studies5–8 have gone beyond enumerating isolated examples to assess its overall frequency relative to body-size decrease or stasis. Thus, although size is clearly an important parameter for microevolution and ecology9–14, including conservation biology10, its impact on large-scale patterns remains poorly understood. The prevalence of Cope's rule is even more uncertain, as some reported cases of evolutionary size increase may actually represent an expansion of a clade's size range (a pattern generally termed an 'Increase in variance', although not necessarily in the formal statistical sense) rather than a phyletic, directional trend15–18. I have performed a comprehensive census of body-size changes in a large fauna of Cretaceous bivalve and gastropod genera. A directional net increase in body size (including the loss of small-sized species and thus representing Cope's rule in the strict sense) is no more frequent than an increase in size range among species or a net evolutionary size decrease. Thus the undisputed ecological importance of body size does not translate into a preferred macroevolutionary pattern.

[1]  N D NEWELL,et al.  PHYLETIC SIZE INCREASE, AN IMPORTANT TREND ILLUSTRATED BY FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES , 1949, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  L. Milne,et al.  The Balance of Nature , 1953, Oryx.

[3]  S. Stanley,et al.  AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULE , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  P. Gingerich Evolutionary Patterns in Early Cenozoic Mammals , 1980 .

[5]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[6]  S. Stanley Population size, extinction, and speciation: the fission effect in Neogene Bivalvia , 1986, Paleobiology.

[7]  M. Labarbera The Evolution and Ecology of Body Size , 1986 .

[8]  David Jablonski,et al.  Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates , 1986 .

[9]  David M. Raup,et al.  Patterns and Processes in the History of Life , 1986, Dahlem Workshop Reports.

[10]  Brian A. Maurer,et al.  Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's rule , 1986, Nature.

[11]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution , 1988, Journal of Paleontology.

[12]  Richard D. Norris,et al.  Biased extinction and evolutionary trends , 1991, Paleobiology.

[13]  G. Vermeij,et al.  The geographic, taxonomic and temporal distribution of determinate growth in marine gastropods , 1992 .

[14]  Deg Briggs,et al.  Palaeobiology: A Synthesis , 1992 .

[15]  James H. Brown,et al.  THE MICRO AND MACRO IN BODY SIZE EVOLUTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  D. McLain Cope's Rules, Sexual Selection, and the Loss of Ecological Plasticity , 1993 .

[17]  D. Edwards,et al.  Evolutionary Patterns and Processes , 1993 .

[18]  D. McShea MECHANISMS OF LARGE‐SCALE EVOLUTIONARY TRENDS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  D. Raup,et al.  Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. , 1995, Science.

[20]  K. Gaston,et al.  Birds, body size and the threat of extinction , 1995 .

[21]  W. Parker,et al.  Causality and Cope's Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera , 1995, Journal of Paleontology.