Cortical neuroplasticity in patients recovering from acute optic neuritis

Patients with optic neuritis (ON) undergo cortical and subcortical neuroplasticity as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, the effect of the heterogeneity of scotomas has not been adequately addressed previously. We introduce a new method of modelling scotomas in fMRI, to reveal a clearer pattern of neuroplasticity, across a mixed patient population. A longitudinal fMRI-study of visual function in 19 ON patients examined at four timepoints between presentation and 6 months was performed. Four different models were compared. The first model included the four different examination timepoints as separate explanatory variables without adjustment for visual field defects. The second model also included covariates reflecting subject-specific deviations in visual field defect from the average group value of the Humphrey mean deviation (HMD) at each examination timepoint. In the third and fourth models the four examination timepoints were not modelled explicitly, but entered vicariously through the associated changes in the HMD for each subject that marked their individual recovery. The results show that the third and fourth models were more sensitive to geniculate and visual cortical neuroplasticity during recovery. Moreover, inferences from the fourth model can be extended to the general population of patients recovering from ON. In conclusion, we present a method of accommodating subject-specific differences between patients with acute ON by inclusion of an HMD-index. This method is sensitive to the processes of neuroplasticity whilst the generalisation of inferences makes the method suitable for future studies of treatment.

[1]  Tanya Orlov,et al.  Normal and abnormal fMRI activation patterns in the visual cortex after recovery from optic neuritis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  P M Matthews,et al.  Functional brain reorganization for hand movement in patients with multiple sclerosis: defining distinct effects of injury and disability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Non-white noise in fMRI: Does modelling have an impact? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[5]  G. T. Plant,et al.  Detection of optic nerve atrophy following a single episode of unilateral optic neuritis by MRI using a fat-saturated short-echo fast FLAIR sequence , 2001, Neuroradiology.

[6]  Stephen J. Jones,et al.  A serial MRI study following optic nerve mean area in acute optic neuritis. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Unilateral Optic Neuritis , 2002, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[9]  P M Matthews,et al.  The motor cortex shows adaptive functional changes to brain injury from multiple sclerosis , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[10]  S J Hickman,et al.  Continuing optic nerve atrophy following optic neuritis: a serial MRI study , 2002, Multiple sclerosis.

[11]  Arnold Skimminge,et al.  Recovery from optic neuritis: an ROI-based analysis of LGN and visual cortical areas. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  P M Matthews,et al.  Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. , 1972, Lancet.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[15]  M. Filippi,et al.  Cortical adaptation in patients with MS: a cross-sectional functional MRI study of disease phenotypes , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Bertrand Audoin,et al.  Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[17]  S. Golaszewski,et al.  Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Giuseppe Scotti,et al.  Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Contribution of Corticospinal Tract Damage to Cortical Motor Reorganization after a Single Clinical Attack of Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis , 1998, Neurology.

[22]  Caterina Mainero,et al.  fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Posterior probability maps and SPMs , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[25]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Reduced visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis patients with optic neuritis: Comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potentials , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[26]  Stephen J. Jones,et al.  Adaptive cortical plasticity in higher visual areas after acute optic neuritis , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[27]  G J Barker,et al.  Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  A longitudinal fMRI study on motor activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the cortical response to photic stimulation in humans following optic neuritis recovery , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[33]  S. Anand Trip,et al.  Optic nerve atrophy and retinal nerve fibre layer thinning following optic neuritis: Evidence that axonal loss is a substrate of MRI-detected atrophy , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Thom Carney,et al.  Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  E Rostrup,et al.  Functional MRI of the visual cortex and visual testing in patients with previous optic neuritis , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[36]  B E Kendall,et al.  The pathophysiology of acute optic neuritis. An association of gadolinium leakage with clinical and electrophysiological deficits. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .