Swab-yourself trial with economic monitoring and testing for infections collectively (SYSTEMATIC): Part 2. A diagnostic accuracy, and cost-effectiveness, study comparing rectal, pharyngeal and urogenital samples analysed individually, versus as a pooled specimen, for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea and

BACKGROUND Sexual history does not accurately identify those with extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) so universal extragenital sampling is recommended. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are expensive. If urogenital, plus rectal and pharyngeal, samples are analysed the diagnostic cost is trebled. Pooling samples into one NAAT container would cost the same as urogenital samples alone. We compared clinician triple samples analysed individually with self-taken pooled samples for diagnostic accuracy, and cost, in MSM and females. METHODS Prospective, convenience, sample in UK sexual health clinic. Randomised order of clinician and self-samples from pharynx, rectum, plus first catch urine (FCU) in MSM and vulvovaginal swabs (VVS) in females, for NG and CT detection. RESULTS Of 1793 participants (1284 females, 509 MSM), 116 had NG detected (75 urogenital, 83 rectum, 72 pharynx). 276 had CT detected (217 urogenital, 249 rectum, 63 pharynx).There was no difference in sensitivities between clinician triple samples and self-pooled specimens for NG (99.1%, 98.3%) but clinician samples analysed individually identified 3% more chlamydia infections than pooled (99.3%, 96.0%; p=0.027). However, pooled specimens identified more infections than VVS/FCU alone. Pooled specimens missed 2 NG and 11 CT infections, whereas VVS/FCU missed 41 NG and 58 CT infections. Self-taken pooled specimens were the most cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Just FCU/VVS testing missed many infections. Self-taken pooled samples were as sensitive as clinician triple samples for identifying NG, but clinician samples analysed individually identified 3% more CT infections than pooled. The extragenital sampling was achievable at no additional diagnostic cost to the FCU/VVS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02371109.

[1]  H. Ward,et al.  Swab-yourself trial with economic monitoring and testing for infections collectively (SYSTEMATIC): Part 1. A diagnostic accuracy, and cost-effectiveness, study comparing clinician-taken versus self-taken rectal and pharyngeal samples for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea and chlamydia. , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  B. Vuylsteke,et al.  To Pool or Not to Pool Samples for Sexually Transmitted Infections Detection in Men Who Have Sex With Men? An Evaluation of a New Pooling Method Using the GeneXpert Instrument in West Africa , 2020, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[3]  C. Fairley,et al.  Pooling Pharyngeal, Anorectal, and Urogenital Samples for Screening Asymptomatic Men Who Have Sex with Men for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  C. Kenyon,et al.  Take three, test one: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pooled pharyngeal, anorectal and urine samples versus single-site testing among men who have sex with men in Belgium , 2018, Acta clinica Belgica.

[5]  Nastassya L Chandra,et al.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in rectal specimens in women and its association with anal intercourse: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[6]  N. Field,et al.  United Kingdom national guideline on the sexual health care of men who have sex with men , 2018 .

[7]  I. Montesinos,et al.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Men Who Have Sex With Men: Diagnostic Accuracy of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Pooled Urine, Anorectal, and Pharyngeal Specimens , 2017, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[8]  D. Speers,et al.  Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis from pooled rectal, pharyngeal and urine specimens in men who have sex with men , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[9]  C. Hoebe,et al.  High Proportion of Anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae After Routine Universal Urogenital and Anorectal Screening in Women Visiting the Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic , 2017, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  Woojoo Lee,et al.  Does McNemar’s test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests? , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  K. Chapin,et al.  Extragenital Infections Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Review of the Literature , 2016, Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  K. Radcliffe,et al.  UK national guideline for the management of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis , 2016 .

[13]  A. Copas,et al.  The “3 in 1” Study: Pooling Self-Taken Pharyngeal, Urethral, and Rectal Samples into a Single Sample for Analysis for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  C. Hoebe,et al.  Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Rectal-Only Chlamydia and Gonorrhoea in Women and in Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  J. Hocking,et al.  The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[16]  Andrew P. Craig,et al.  Is it time to switch to doxycycline from azithromycin for treating genital chlamydial infections in women? Modelling the impact of autoinoculation from the gastrointestinal tract to the genital tract , 2015, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[17]  E. Portillo,et al.  Self-collected swabs of the urinary meatus diagnose more Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections than first catch urine from men , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[18]  J. Hodson,et al.  Chlamydia and gonorrhoea contamination of clinic surfaces , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[19]  C. Gaydos,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of two self-collected sample kit distribution systems for chlamydia screening on a university campus , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[20]  R. Kohn,et al.  Infections missed by urethral-only screening for chlamydia or gonorrhea detection among men who have sex with men. , 2011, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[21]  E. Meader,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis RNA in the environment: is there potential for false-positive nucleic acid amplification test results? , 2008, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[22]  R. Ness,et al.  Systematic Review: Noninvasive Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  R. Peeling,et al.  Sensitivity requirements for the point of care diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.