Benchmarking AMBER Force Fields for RNA: Comparisons to NMR Spectra for Single-Stranded r(GACC) Are Improved by Revised χ Torsions

Accurately modeling unpaired regions of RNA is important for predicting structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of folded RNA. Comparisons between NMR data and molecular dynamics simulations provide a test of force fields used for modeling. Here, NMR spectroscopy, including NOESY, 1H–31P HETCOR, DQF-COSY, and TOCSY, was used to determine conformational preferences for single-stranded GACC RNA. The spectra are consistent with a conformational ensemble containing major and minor A-form-like structures. In a series of 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the AMBER99 force field in explicit solvent, initial A-form-like structures rapidly evolve to disordered conformations. A set of 50 ns simulations with revised χ torsions (AMBER99χ force field) gives two primary conformations, consistent with the NMR spectra. A single 1.9 μs MD simulation with the AMBER99χ force field showed that the major and minor conformations are retained for almost 68% of the time in the first 700 ns, with multiple transformations from A-form to non-A-form conformations. For the rest of the simulation, random-coil structures and a stable non-A-form conformation inconsistent with NMR spectra were seen. Evidently, the AMBER99χ force field improves structural predictions for single-stranded GACC RNA compared to the AMBER99 force field, but further force field improvements are needed.

[1]  Raymond F. Gesteland,et al.  RNA worlds : from life's origins to diversity in gene regulation , 2011 .

[2]  Michal Otyepka,et al.  Performance of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for RNA Simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA Hairpins. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[3]  Anton I. Petrov,et al.  Quantum chemical studies of nucleic acids: can we construct a bridge to the RNA structural biology and bioinformatics communities? , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  Harry A. Stern,et al.  Reparameterization of RNA χ Torsion Parameters for the AMBER Force Field and Comparison to NMR Spectra for Cytidine and Uridine , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Atomic accuracy in predicting and designing non-canonical RNA structure , 2010, Nature Methods.

[6]  J. Šponer,et al.  Single Stranded Loops of Quadruplex DNA As Key Benchmark for Testing Nucleic Acids Force Fields. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[7]  D. Turner,et al.  Effects of Restrained Sampling Space and Nonplanar Amino Groups on Free-Energy Predictions for RNA with Imino and Sheared Tandem GA Base Pairs Flanked by GC, CG, iGiC or iCiG Base Pairs , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[8]  Kristen K. Dang,et al.  Architecture and Secondary Structure of an Entire HIV-1 RNA Genome , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Douglas H Turner,et al.  Contributions of stacking, preorganization, and hydrogen bonding to the thermodynamic stability of duplexes between RNA and 2'-O-methyl RNA with locked nucleic acids. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[10]  R. Dror,et al.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[11]  B. Schneider,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the ApA, ApC, CpA, and CpC RNA dinucleoside monophosphates resolved with NMR scalar spin-spin couplings. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Hirotaka Ode,et al.  Force field parameters for rotation around χ torsion axis in nucleic acids , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  J. P. Grossman,et al.  Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation , 2008, CACM.

[14]  R. Dror,et al.  Microsecond molecular dynamics simulation shows effect of slow loop dynamics on backbone amide order parameters of proteins. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  Helen M Berman,et al.  RNA backbone: consensus all-angle conformers and modular string nomenclature (an RNA Ontology Consortium contribution). , 2008, RNA.

[16]  J. Šponer,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers , 2007 .

[17]  D. Turner,et al.  RNA challenges for computational chemists. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[18]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Exploring the Essential Dynamics of B-DNA. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  S. Acharya,et al.  Single-stranded adenine-rich DNA and RNA retain structural characteristics of their respective double-stranded conformations and show directional differences in stacking pattern. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[20]  Thomas E Cheatham,et al.  Simulation and modeling of nucleic acid structure, dynamics and interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  Helen M Berman,et al.  RNA conformational classes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Celeste Sagui,et al.  Towards an accurate representation of electrostatics in classical force fields: efficient implementation of multipolar interactions in biomolecular simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Y. Chan,et al.  The common and the distinctive features of the bulged-G motif based on a 1.04 A resolution RNA structure. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Theoretical methods for the simulation of nucleic acids. , 2003, Chemical Society reviews.

[25]  Bojan Zagrovic,et al.  Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: Distributed computing study , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Pavel Hobza,et al.  Toward true DNA base-stacking energies: MP2, CCSD(T), and complete basis set calculations. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  Richard Lavery,et al.  Simulations of nucleic acids and their complexes. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[28]  Gary Ruvkun,et al.  Glimpses of a Tiny RNA World , 2001, Science.

[29]  Vadim V. Demidov,et al.  Nucleic Acids: Structures, Properties and Functions , 2001 .

[30]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Electronic properties, hydrogen bonding, stacking, and cation binding of DNA and RNA bases , 2001, Biopolymers.

[31]  T. Darden,et al.  Efficient particle-mesh Ewald based approach to fixed and induced dipolar interactions , 2000 .

[32]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  A mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) method for large‐scale modeling of chemistry in protein environments , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  D. Beveridge,et al.  Nucleic acids: theory and computer simulation, Y2K. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  P. Hobza,et al.  Global Minimum of the Adenine···Thymine Base Pair Corresponds Neither to Watson−Crick Nor to Hoogsteen Structures. Molecular Dynamic/Quenching/AMBER and ab Initio beyond Hartree−Fock Studies , 2000 .

[35]  J. Šponer,et al.  Structure, Energetics, and Dynamics of the Nucleic Acid Base Pairs: Nonempirical ab initio Calculations , 2000 .

[36]  D. Case,et al.  Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations , 2000, Biopolymers.

[37]  P Hobza,et al.  Structure, energetics, and dynamics of the nucleic Acid base pairs: nonempirical ab initio calculations. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[38]  Paul Tavan,et al.  A hybrid method for solutes in complex solvents: Density functional theory combined with empirical force fields , 1999 .

[39]  Andrew E. Torda,et al.  The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package , 1999 .

[40]  P. Kollman,et al.  Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. , 1998, Science.

[41]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium , 1996 .

[42]  Gabriele Varani,et al.  NMR investigation of RNA structure , 1996 .

[43]  J. Šponer,et al.  Nature of Nucleic Acid−Base Stacking: Nonempirical ab Initio and Empirical Potential Characterization of 10 Stacked Base Dimers. Comparison of Stacked and H-Bonded Base Pairs , 1996 .

[44]  Jiali Gao,et al.  Optimization of the Lennard‐Jones parameters for a combined ab initio quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical potential using the 3‐21G basis set , 1996 .

[45]  Claude Millot,et al.  A coupled density functional‐molecular mechanics Monte Carlo simulation method: The water molecule in liquid water , 1996 .

[46]  Alan E. Mark,et al.  The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide , 1996 .

[47]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Pairwise solute descreening of solute charges from a dielectric medium , 1995 .

[48]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[49]  P. Moore,et al.  The sarcin/ricin loop, a modular RNA. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  F. Zoulim,et al.  Role of RNA in enzymatic activity of the reverse transcriptase of hepatitis B viruses , 1994, Journal of virology.

[51]  S C Harvey,et al.  A quantitative model of the Escherichia coli 16 S RNA in the 30 S ribosomal subunit. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  A. V. Grimstone,et al.  Cell science , 1994, Nature.

[53]  V. Ambros,et al.  The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14 , 1993, Cell.

[54]  Kenneth M. Merz,et al.  Calculation of solvation free energies using a density functional/molecular dynamics coupled potential , 1993 .

[55]  J. Gao,et al.  A priori evaluation of aqueous polarization effects through Monte Carlo QM-MM simulations. , 1992, Science.

[56]  G. Varani,et al.  RNA structure and NMR spectroscopy , 1991, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[57]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ion-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations , 1990 .

[58]  D. Longmore The principles of magnetic resonance. , 1989, British medical bulletin.

[59]  Martin J. Field,et al.  Free energy perturbation method for chemical reactions in the condensed phase: a dynamic approach based on a combined quantum and molecular mechanics potential , 1987 .

[60]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[61]  N. Pace,et al.  The RNA moiety of ribonuclease P is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme , 1983, Cell.

[62]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[63]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[64]  J. V. van Boom,et al.  Conformational analysis of the single-stranded ribonucleic acid A-A-C-C. A one-dimensional and two-dimensional proton NMR study at 500 MHz. , 1983, European journal of biochemistry.

[65]  T. Cech,et al.  Self-splicing RNA: Autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of tetrahymena , 1982, Cell.

[66]  D. Turner,et al.  Solvent effects on the kinetics and thermodynamics of stacking in poly(cytidylic acid). , 1981, Biochemistry.

[67]  D. Turner,et al.  Laser temperature-jump study of stacking in adenylic acid polymers. , 1979, Biochemistry.

[68]  D. Pörchke Molecular states in single‐stranded adenylate chains by relaxation analysis , 1978 .

[69]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[70]  M. Levitt,et al.  Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  D. Porschke The Dynamics of Nucleic‐Acid Single‐Strand Conformation Changes , 1973 .

[72]  M. Sundaralingam,et al.  Conformational analysis of the sugar ring in nucleosides and nucleotides. Improved method for the interpretation of proton magnetic resonance coupling constants. , 1973, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[73]  M. Sundaralingam,et al.  Conformational analysis of the sugar ring in nucleosides and nucleotides. A new description using the concept of pseudorotation. , 1972, Journal of the American Chemical Society.