Investigating the effects of DEM error in scaling analysis.

Digital elevation models (DEMs) are prone to error that, as they can never be entirely eliminated, must be managed effectively. Thus, it is important to understand the nature of error and their sources, especially in the context of the intended use of a DEM. This paper investigates the effects that can be expected when common DEM errors propagate through a scaling analysis. The errors investigated include those associated with perturbation of camera exterior orientation parameters, focal length, and DEM image coordinates, which were simulated numerically. The role of detrending was also investigated. Scaling analysis, by way of the fractal dimension, using a new two-dimensional approach was carried out on a variety of surfaces before and after the introduction of error and the application of detrending. The results reveal some serious procedural implications on scaling analysis and cast doubt on the authenticity of some scaling analysis results in the absence of robust quality assessment and of independent supporting evidence.

[1]  Y. D. Huang.  Evaluation of Information Loss in Digital Elevation Models With Digital Photogrammetric Systems , 2000 .

[2]  S. Lane,et al.  Characterization of the Structure of River-Bed Gravels Using Two-Dimensional Fractal Analysis , 2001 .

[3]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I: The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation , 1983 .

[4]  André Robert,et al.  Statistical properties of sediment bed profiles in alluvial channels , 1988 .

[5]  I. Moore,et al.  Fractals, fractal dimensions and landscapes — a review , 1993 .

[6]  Geoffrey S. Watson,et al.  Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation. , 1978 .

[7]  J. Brickmann.  B. Mandelbrot: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Co., San Francisco 1982. 460 Seiten, Preis: £ 22,75. , 1985 .

[8]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost-effective non-metric close-range digital photogrammetry and its application to a study of coarse gravel river beds , 2003 .

[9]  George A. Griffiths,et al.  Form Resistance in Gravel Channels with Mobile Beds , 1989 .

[10]  B. Mandelbrot.  How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension , 1967, Science.

[11]  A. Roy,et al.  MEASURING THE DIMENSION OF SURFACES: A REVIEW AND APPRAISAL OF DIFFERENT METHODS , 2008 .

[12]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[13]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Effects of Various Factors on the Accuracy of DEMs: An Intensive Experimental Investigation , 2000 .

[14]  R. D. Hobson.  Surface roughness in topography: quantitative approach , 2019, Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology.

[15]  N. Cressie,et al.  Robust estimation of the variogram: I , 1980 .

[16]  Brian Klinkenberg,et al.  A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features , 1994 .

[17]  A. Robert.  Fractal properties of simulated bed profiles in coarse-grained channels , 1991 .

[18]  M. A. Oliver,et al.  Semi‐variograms for modelling the spatial pattern of landform and soil properties , 1986 .

[19]  P. Burrough.  Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data , 1981, Nature.

[20]  A. C. Armstrong.  On the fractal dimensions of some transient soil properties , 1986 .

[21]  S. Krantz.  Fractal geometry , 1989 .

[22]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , 1998 .

[23]  P. Fisher,et al.  Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models , 1992 .

[24]  P. Wolf,et al.  Elements of Photogrammetry(with Applications in GIS) , 2000 .

[25]  S. N. Lane,et al.  Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research , 2000 .

[26]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  On the use of digital elevation model data for Hortonian and fractal analyses of channel networks , 1993 .

[27]  M. Goodchild,et al.  The fractal properties of topography: A comparison of methods , 1992 .

[28]  Alwyn E. Annels,et al.  Geostatistical Ore-reserve Estimation , 1991 .

[29]  Masuo Suzuki.  Finite-Size Scaling for Transient Similarity and Fractals , 1984 .

[30]  N. Tate.  Estimating the fractal dimension of synthetic topographic surfaces , 1998 .

[31]  David Michel,et al.  Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation , 1977 .

[32]  D. Mark,et al.  Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping , 1984 .

[33]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  The science of fractal images , 2011 .

[34]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Bar Form Resistance in Gravel‐Bed Rivers , 1988 .

[35]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  On gravel‐bed roughness characterization , 1998 .

[36]  On the modelling of sand bedforms using the semivariogram , 1988 .

[37]  M. Goodchild,et al.  The Fractal Nature of Geographic Phenomena , 1987 .

[38]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Flow Resistance in Gravel-Bed Rivers , 1979 .

[39]  Alberto Malinverno,et al.  The length‐scaling properties of topography , 1994 .

[40]  R. Wen,et al.  Uncertainty in fractal dimension estimated from power spectra and variograms , 1997 .