The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Narrowband speech can be separated into fast temporal cues [temporal fine structure (TFS)], and slow amplitude modulations (envelope). Speech processed to contain only TFS leads to envelope recovery through cochlear filtering, which has been suggested to account for TFS-speech intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Hearing-impaired listeners have deficits with TFS-speech identification, but the contribution of recovered-envelope cues to these deficits is unknown. This was assessed for hearing-impaired listeners by measuring identification of disyllables processed to contain TFS or recovered-envelope cues. Hearing-impaired listeners performed worse than normal-hearing listeners, but TFS-speech intelligibility was accounted for by recovered-envelope cues for both groups.

[1]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[2]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Stickney,et al.  On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  Temporal-Envelope Reconstruction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[6]  Sarah E. Yoho,et al.  Can envelope recovery account for speech recognition based on temporal fine structure , 2013 .

[7]  Shihab Shamma,et al.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  O Ghitza,et al.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R V Shannon,et al.  Consonant recordings for speech testing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Quantifying Envelope and Fine-Structure Coding in Auditory Nerve Responses to Chimaeric Speech , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[16]  L. Braida Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[19]  J. L. Flanagan,et al.  Parametric coding of speech spectra , 1980 .

[20]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.