Latitudinal profile of the ionospheric disturbance dynamo magnetic signature: comparison with the DP2 magnetic disturbance

During magnetic storms, the auroral electrojets intensification affects the thermospheric circulation on a global scale. This process which leads to electric field and current disturbance at middle and low latitudes, on the quiet day after the end of a storm, has been attributed to the ionospheric disturbance dynamo (Ddyn). The magnetic field disturbance observed as a result of this process is the reduction of the H component amplitude in the equatorial region which constitutes the main characteristic of the ionospheric disturbance dynamo process, associated with a westward electric current flow. The latitudinal profile of the Ddyn disturbance dynamo magnetic signature exhibits an eastward current at mid latitudes and a westward one at low latitudes with a substantial amplification at the magnetic equator. Such current flow reveals an "anti-Sq" system established between the mid latitudes and the equatorial region and opposes the normal Sq current vortex. However, the localization of the eastward current and consequently the position and the extent of the "anti-Sq" current vortex changes from one storm to another. Indeed, for a strong magnetic storm, the eastward current is well established at mid latitudes about 45° N and for a weak magnetic storm, the eastward current is established toward the high latitudes (about 60° N), near the Joule heating region, resulting in a large "anti-Sq" current cell. The latitudinal profile of the Ddyn disturbance as well as the magnetic disturbance DP2 generated by the mechanism of prompt penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field in general, show a weak disturbance at the low latitudes with a substantial amplification at the magnetic equator. Due to the intensity of the storm, the magnitude of the DP2 appears higher than the Ddyn over the American and Asian sector contrary to the African sector.

[1]  T. Pant,et al.  Equatorial ionosphere-thermosphere system during geomagnetic storms , 2013 .

[2]  T. Kikuchi,et al.  Penetration of magnetospheric electric fields to the equator during a geomagnetic storm , 2008 .

[3]  M. L. Huy,et al.  Magnetic signature of the Ionospheric disturbance dynamo at equatorial latitudes “Ddyn”, ICDC –session N° 1. , 2005 .

[4]  A. Richmond,et al.  Theoretical effects of geomagnetic activity on low‐latitude ionospheric electric fields , 2005 .

[5]  R. Roble,et al.  Long-lasting disturbances in the equatorial ionospheric electric field simulated with a coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model , 2003 .

[6]  Bela G. Fejer,et al.  Low latitude storm time ionospheric electrodynamics , 2002 .

[7]  A. Kobea,et al.  Electrodynamic coupling of high and low latitudes: Simulations of shielding/overshielding effects , 2000 .

[8]  H. Lühr,et al.  Electrodynamic coupling of high and low latitudes: Observations on May 27, 1993 , 2000 .

[9]  H. Lühr,et al.  Direct penetration of the polar electric field to the equator during a DP 2 event as detected by the auroral and equatorial magnetometer chains and the EISCAT radar , 1996 .

[10]  L. Scherliess,et al.  Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances , 1995 .

[11]  M. Menvielle,et al.  Global disturbance of the transient magnetic field associated with thermospheric storm winds on March 23, 1979 , 1990 .

[12]  C. Mazaudier,et al.  Delayed ionospheric effects of the geomagnetic storms of March 22, 1979 studied by the sixth co-ordinated data analysis workshop (CDAW-6) , 1990 .

[13]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Penetration of high latitude electric fields effects tolow latitude during Sundial 1984 , 1988 .

[14]  A. Richmond,et al.  On thermospheric winds produced by auroral heating during magnetic storms and associated dynamo electric fields , 1987 .

[15]  R. Bernard,et al.  Correction to “Saint-Santin Radar observations of lower thermospheric storms” , 1985 .

[16]  D. T. Farley,et al.  Equatorial disturbance dynamo electric fields , 1983 .

[17]  Michel Blanc,et al.  On the control of magnetospheric convection by the spatial distribution of ionospheric conductivities , 1982 .

[18]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  The ionospheric disturbance dynamo , 1980 .

[19]  R. Roble,et al.  Dynamic effects of aurora-generated gravity waves on the mid-latitude ionosphere , 1979 .

[20]  T. Hill,et al.  Influence of solar wind variability on geomagnetic activity , 1974 .

[21]  J. Burch.  Observations of interactions between interplanetary and geomagnetic fields , 1974 .

[22]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Partial ring current models for worldwide geomagnetic disturbances. , 1973 .

[23]  T. Rosenberg,et al.  Relationship of interplanetary parameters and occurrence of magnetospheric substorms , 1971 .

[24]  R. L. Arnoldy,et al.  SIGNATURE IN THE INTERPLANETARY MEDIUM FOR SUBSTORMS. , 1971 .

[25]  R. Wolf.  Effects of ionospheric conductivity on convective flow of plasma in the magnetosphere , 1970 .

[26]  A. Nishida.  Geomagnetic Dp 2 fluctuations and associated magnetospheric phenomena , 1968 .

[27]  K. Cole.  Magnetic storms and associated phenomena , 1966 .

[28]  S. Akasofu.  A source of the energy for geomagnetic storms and auroras. , 1964 .

[29]  E. Nielsen,et al.  AT IONOSPHERIC ALTITUDES FROM A CHAIN OF MAGNETIC AND RADAR DATA , 1984 .

[30]  A. Richmond,et al.  The Quiet-Time Equatorial Electrojet and Counter-Electrojet , 1979 .

[31]  T. Murayama,et al.  Effects of solar wind parameters on the development of magnetospheric substorms , 1975 .

[32]  G. Rostoker,et al.  RESPONSE TIME OF THE MAGNETOSPHERE TO THE INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD. , 1972 .

[33]  V. Vasyliūnas,et al.  The Interrelationship of Magnetospheric Processes , 1972 .

[34]  V. Vasyliūnas,et al.  Mathematical models of magnetospheric convection and its coupling to the ionosphere , 1970 .

[35]  A. Nishida,et al.  ORIGIN OF FLUCTUATIONS IN THE EQUATORIAL ELECTROJET: A NEW TYPE OF GEOMAGNETIC VARIATION. , 1966 .