Flame Retardancy of Lightweight Sandwich Composites

This study proposes an innovative solution to flame-retard a sandwich composite made of unsaturated polyester resin, glass fibre skins and polyester nonwoven core material. The strategy uses the core material as flame-retardant carrier, while the resin is also flame-retarded with aluminum trihydroxide (ATH). A screening of the fire-retardant performances of the core materials, covered with different types of phosphorous flame-retardant additives (phosphate, phosphinate, phosphonate), was performed using cone calorimetry. The best candidate was selected and evaluated in the sandwich panel. Great performances were obtained with ammonium polyphosphate (AP422) at 262 g/m2. The core material, when tested alone, did not ignite, and when used in the laminate, improved the fire behaviour by decreasing the peak of heat release rate (pHRR) and the total heat release (THR): the second peak in HRR observed for the references (full glass monolith and sandwich with the untreated core) was suppressed in this case. This improvement is attributed to the interaction occurring between the two FR additives, which leads to the formation of aluminophosphates, as shown using Electron Probe Micro-Analysis (EPMA), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and solid-state 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The influence of the FR add-on on the core, as well as the ATH loading in the matrix, was studied separately to optimize the material performances in terms of smoke and heat release. The best compromise was obtained using AP422 at 182 g/m2 and 160 phr of ATH.

[1]  M. Taha,et al.  Towards Selection Charts for Epoxy Resin, Unsaturated Polyester Resin and Their Fibre-Fabric Composites with Flame Retardants , 2021, Materials.

[2]  H. Judawisastra,et al.  Development of a fire-retardant 3-dimensional woven glass-polyester sandwich composite , 2020 .

[3]  C. Rudd,et al.  Fire performance of sandwich composites with intumescent mat protection: Evolving thermal insulation, post-fire performance and rail industry testing , 2020 .

[4]  Daining Fang,et al.  Fire protection design for composite lattice sandwich structure , 2017 .

[5]  S. Bourbigot,et al.  Microintumescent mechanism of flame‐retardant water‐based chitosan–ammonium polyphosphate multilayer nanocoating on cotton fabric , 2016 .

[6]  E. Kandare,et al.  Evaluating the heat resistance of thermal insulated sandwich composites subjected to a turbulent fire , 2016 .

[7]  M. Dietenberger,et al.  Treated and untreated foam core particleboards with intumescent veneer , 2013, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[8]  S. Bourbigot,et al.  Intumescence as method for providing fire resistance to structural composites: application to poly(ethylene terephtalate) foam sandwich–structured composite , 2013 .

[9]  Fabienne Samyn,et al.  Thermal decomposition of flame retarded formulations PA6/aluminum phosphinate/melamine polyphosphate/organomodified clay: Interactions between the constituents? , 2012 .

[10]  É. Devaux,et al.  Fire performances comparison of back coating and melt spinning approaches for PET covering textiles , 2012 .

[11]  J. Zhao,et al.  The synthesis and properties of a reactive flame‐retardant unsaturated polyester resin from a phosphorus‐containing diacid , 2011 .

[12]  G. Malucelli,et al.  Novel flame retardant finishing systems for cotton fabrics based on phosphorus-containing compounds and silica derived from sol-gel processes , 2011 .

[13]  S. Duquesne,et al.  Ammonium polyphosphate–aluminum trihydroxide antagonism in fire retarded butadiene–styrene block copolymer , 2005 .

[14]  S. Duquesne,et al.  Influence of ammonium polyphosphate on the mechanism of thermal degradation of an acrylic binder resin , 2004 .

[15]  E. Kandare,et al.  Fire reaction properties of flax/epoxy laminates and their balsa-core sandwich composites with or without fire protection , 2014 .